Sign In
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal (Judge Rtd)
      • Ad. Ramprakash Rajagopal
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • Ad. James Raja
      • Ad. M.S.Parthiban
      • Ad. Rajavel
      • Ad. Azhar Basha
      • Mr. Lokkeshvaran
      • Prasath
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
    • Legal Drafting
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • E-Booklet
    • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940: If seller proves that he acquired the drug or cosmetic from a duly licensed manufacturer, distributor or dealer. He shall not be liable for a contravention of section18 of the Act
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • E-Booklet
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Quick Recall> General> Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940: If seller proves that he acquired the drug or cosmetic from a duly licensed manufacturer, distributor or dealer. He shall not be liable for a contravention of section18 of the Act

Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940: If seller proves that he acquired the drug or cosmetic from a duly licensed manufacturer, distributor or dealer. He shall not be liable for a contravention of section18 of the Act

Ramprakash Rajagopal November 13, 2023 2 Min Read
Share
Prayer

Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, pleased to call for the records pertaining in C.C. No.03 of 2008 on the file of the learned XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai and quash the same.

The Drug Inspector, Park Town I Range, on 25.10.2005 conducted search and seized AMOXYCILLIN capsules manufactured by United Pharma Remedies from the traders M/s.Venus Agency, M/s.Ambica Parmceuticals and M/s.Vasant Pharma Traders and M/s.Mahaa Bio, Chennai.

  1. This Court allowed the quash petition and as on date, there is no complaint against the manufacturer. This petitioner who is arrayed as A7 is not the manufacturer, he is a seller of drug. Under Section 19 (3) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, a person, not being the manufacturer of a drug or cosmetic or his agent for the distribution thereof, shall not be liable for a contravention of Section 18 if he proves that he acquired the drug or cosmetic from a duly licensed manufacturer, distributor or dealer thereof and he is acted diligently without knowledge of the contravention of the provision.

  2. From the complaint, it is apparently seen that the petitioner is only a seller neither the manufacturer nor the agent of the manufacturer. When the case against the manufacture now been quashed, nothing survives in this petition. This quash petition is allowed at the SR stage itself. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.

PARTY: S.Manoj Kumar … Petitioner vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Drugs Inspector, Park Town I Range, Office of the Assistant Director of Drug Control, Zone -I, Chennai – 600 006 … Respondent – Crl.O.P.SR.No.44154 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.15145 of 2023 – 10.10.2023 – CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/1077651

s.manoj kumar vs. state – drugs act

Further Study

POCSO Case: Petition for compromise quash filed by the victim herself stating she wants to marry some other person: Madras High Court after enquiry dismissed the petition on impression that the petitioner was not filed the petition voluntarily

TAGGED:1940cosmeticsdrug case quasheddrug manufacturerdrug sellerdrugsDRUGS & COSMETICS ACTjustice jayachandranmanoj kumar
Previous Article POCSO Case: Petition for compromise quash filed by the victim herself stating she wants to marry some other person: Madras High Court after enquiry dismissed the petition on impression that the petitioner was not filed the petition voluntarily
Next Article Conviction upheld under section 302 IPC and sections 55, 57 Abkari Act
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

cheque case directions

Cheque cases courts need not summon the accused before taking cognizance since NI Act is a special enactment

Ramprakash Rajagopal October 1, 2025
Types of conduct of witnesses is explained in detail
Timely Quash order
Since no provocation nor blow stuck by mistake or accident section 300 Exception- 1 would not attract
Procedure in Rape and Offences against women  Cases Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 ; A Victim Centric Approach

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?