Sign In
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal (Judge Rtd)
      • Ad. Ramprakash Rajagopal
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • Ad. James Raja
      • Ad. M.S.Parthiban
      • Ad. Rajavel
      • Ad. Azhar Basha
      • Mr. Lokkeshvaran
      • Prasath
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
    • Legal Drafting
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • E-Booklet
    • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: POCSO Case: Petition for compromise quash filed by the victim herself stating she wants to marry some other person: Madras High Court after enquiry dismissed the petition on impression that the petitioner was not filed the petition voluntarily
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • E-Booklet
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Quick Recall> General> POCSO Case: Petition for compromise quash filed by the victim herself stating she wants to marry some other person: Madras High Court after enquiry dismissed the petition on impression that the petitioner was not filed the petition voluntarily

POCSO Case: Petition for compromise quash filed by the victim herself stating she wants to marry some other person: Madras High Court after enquiry dismissed the petition on impression that the petitioner was not filed the petition voluntarily

Ramprakash Rajagopal November 13, 2023 4 Min Read
Share
PRAYER FOR COMPROMISE FILED BY THE VICTIM IN POCSO CASE

Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC to call for the records made in Spl.S.C.No.138 of 2023 pending on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court at Tiruvallore and quash the same.

A 16 years old girl was subjected to penetrative sexual offence by her music teacher aged about 35 years. When this information was brought to the notice of All Women Police Station, Avadi, through the mother of the victim girl, a case was registered. A statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., was recorded and thereafter, Final Report filed before the Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruvallore. The Final Report was taken on file in Spl.S.C.No.138 of 2023 for the offences under Sections 3(b), 3(d), 4(2), 11(1), 11(2), 11(4), 11(5) and 12 of POCSO Act and Section 67(B)(a) of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Sections 323, 366, 376(1),376(3) of IPC.

  1. The matter is ripe for trial. At this point of time, the victim girl along with her mother, who is the defacto complainant, has filed this petition to quash their own complaint stating that it was love affair between the victim minor girl and the music teacher, aged 35. The complaint was lodged, since the accused refused to sever the relationship. Now, the victim girl wants to get married to some other person so they are not interested in prosecuting the case.

  2. The victim girl and the mother of the victim girl both were present before this Court on 09.10.2023 and reiterated the content of the petition.

4 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners citing the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and another judgment of the High Court, where the love affair between two juvenile persons, the Court had exercised its power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to quash the complaint, since both have later married each other.

  1. This Court is certain that the circumstances on which those two judgments rendered do not apply to the present case. This is neither a case of infatuation between two juveniles nor consensual sex. This is a case of penetrative sex by a music teacher on the victim girl who gone to learn music from him. It is a case of seducing, intimidating and forcible sex against a child using threat.

  2. It is very obvious, the accused had threatened the victim and her family. On enquiry with the petitioner, this Court understand that the accused is living in the very same area. This gives an impression that this present petition is not filed voluntarily, but under some external pressure. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the respondent police is directed to give 24×7 police protection to the victim child and her family. In case, any attempt to temper the witness comes to the notice of the police or to the Court, necessary action to be taken for cancelling the bail. The Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruvallore is directed to conduct the trial on day to day basis and complete it within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

PARTY: P.Jayashree .. Petitioner/Defacto complainant versus 1.The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, W-29, Avadi Alla Women Police Station, Chennai 600 054. (Cr.No.3/2023) – Crl.O.P.No.22545 of 2023 – 16.10.2023.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/1076993

P.Jayashree vs. The State   

(kindly note that P.Jayashree is not the name of the victim)

 

Further Study

Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940: If seller proves that he acquired the drug or cosmetic from a duly licensed manufacturer, distributor or dealer. He shall not be liable for a contravention of section18 of the Act

POCSO: Evidentiary value of the victim girl

After 45 years, the rape case has come to an end with the acquittal being set aside

Omission to take photograph of vehicle by the I.O is not fatal TNPPDL Act

SC/ST Act: No intention accused had to insult the complainant based on her caste

TAGGED:compromisejayachandran jjayashreejustice jayachandranpocso compromisepocso compromise petition dismissedsupreme court judgmentssupreme court judgments not citedvictimvictim wants to marry some other person
Previous Article Section 138: When transaction already is within N.I Act then the transaction does not come within section 4 of the Tamilnadu prohibition of charging exorbitant interest Act, 2003
Next Article Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940: If seller proves that he acquired the drug or cosmetic from a duly licensed manufacturer, distributor or dealer. He shall not be liable for a contravention of section18 of the Act
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

investigation

Guidelines to the Courts to take control over investigation including sanctioning order

sectionnew November 22, 2025
N.I Act: If a cheque is deposited in the branch (bank) it is deemed to be presented where the account holder holds the account
TVK & CBI: Karur Stampede: Interim order and directions regarding CBI investigation on the issue
Disposal of criminal cases more than 3 years involving offences punishable with imprisonment of upto 3 years pending at trial appeal or revision stage
Legal Drafting -2: Defining Legal Drafting (A short overview)

Related Study

NDPS: Confession: Explained
January 19, 2023
Voluntary Surrender before non-jurisdictional Magistrate: My candid opinion dedicated to His Lordship _by Ramprakash Rajagopal, Advocate.
January 12, 2026
Writing judgment is an art
May 25, 2023
Apex court uncovered the ongoing tendency of misusing provisions like section 498A IPC for unleashing personal vendetta against husband and his family
December 12, 2024
Court must extremely cautious in passing adverse remarks in bail
March 21, 2023
An offence under section 13(1)(e) PC Act can be abetted by any other person who is a non-public servant
May 14, 2025
Confession recorded in the language unknown to the accused not improper if properly took down
April 19, 2023
Conviction Sudden provocation
April 8, 2023
Anticipatory Bail cannot be granted against NBW
April 8, 2025
Section 138 NI Act: Cheque itself is a promise to pay even if the debt is barred by time
September 8, 2023

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?