Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal
      • AD. RAMPRAKASH RAJAGOPAL
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • James Raja
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • Legal words
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: POCSO Case: Petition for compromise quash filed by the victim herself stating she wants to marry some other person: Madras High Court after enquiry dismissed the petition on impression that the petitioner was not filed the petition voluntarily
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Quick Recall> General> POCSO Case: Petition for compromise quash filed by the victim herself stating she wants to marry some other person: Madras High Court after enquiry dismissed the petition on impression that the petitioner was not filed the petition voluntarily

POCSO Case: Petition for compromise quash filed by the victim herself stating she wants to marry some other person: Madras High Court after enquiry dismissed the petition on impression that the petitioner was not filed the petition voluntarily

Ramprakash Rajagopal November 13, 2023 4 Min Read
Share
Points
PRAYER FOR COMPROMISE FILED BY THE VICTIM IN POCSO CASE
PRAYER FOR COMPROMISE FILED BY THE VICTIM IN POCSO CASE

Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC to call for the records made in Spl.S.C.No.138 of 2023 pending on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court at Tiruvallore and quash the same.

A 16 years old girl was subjected to penetrative sexual offence by her music teacher aged about 35 years. When this information was brought to the notice of All Women Police Station, Avadi, through the mother of the victim girl, a case was registered. A statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., was recorded and thereafter, Final Report filed before the Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruvallore. The Final Report was taken on file in Spl.S.C.No.138 of 2023 for the offences under Sections 3(b), 3(d), 4(2), 11(1), 11(2), 11(4), 11(5) and 12 of POCSO Act and Section 67(B)(a) of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Sections 323, 366, 376(1),376(3) of IPC.

  1. The matter is ripe for trial. At this point of time, the victim girl along with her mother, who is the defacto complainant, has filed this petition to quash their own complaint stating that it was love affair between the victim minor girl and the music teacher, aged 35. The complaint was lodged, since the accused refused to sever the relationship. Now, the victim girl wants to get married to some other person so they are not interested in prosecuting the case.

  2. The victim girl and the mother of the victim girl both were present before this Court on 09.10.2023 and reiterated the content of the petition.

4 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners citing the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and another judgment of the High Court, where the love affair between two juvenile persons, the Court had exercised its power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to quash the complaint, since both have later married each other.

  1. This Court is certain that the circumstances on which those two judgments rendered do not apply to the present case. This is neither a case of infatuation between two juveniles nor consensual sex. This is a case of penetrative sex by a music teacher on the victim girl who gone to learn music from him. It is a case of seducing, intimidating and forcible sex against a child using threat.

  2. It is very obvious, the accused had threatened the victim and her family. On enquiry with the petitioner, this Court understand that the accused is living in the very same area. This gives an impression that this present petition is not filed voluntarily, but under some external pressure. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the respondent police is directed to give 24×7 police protection to the victim child and her family. In case, any attempt to temper the witness comes to the notice of the police or to the Court, necessary action to be taken for cancelling the bail. The Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruvallore is directed to conduct the trial on day to day basis and complete it within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

PARTY: P.Jayashree .. Petitioner/Defacto complainant versus 1.The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, W-29, Avadi Alla Women Police Station, Chennai 600 054. (Cr.No.3/2023) – Crl.O.P.No.22545 of 2023 – 16.10.2023.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/1076993

P.Jayashree vs. The State   

(kindly note that P.Jayashree is not the name of the victim)

 

Subject Study

  • POCSO: Delay in lodging the FIR is not fatal to the prosecution case
  • Class 3 – CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS – GENERAL PROVISIONS – CRIMINAL COURT POWERS.
  • Quashing fir: High court cannot conduct mini investigation under section 482 cr.p.c as per Neeharika Infrastructure case
  • Basic understanding: A common knowledge in types of crimes and in perspective of Indian criminal laws
  • Section 173(2) Cr.P.C: Direction: Apex court directed the police officers to comply with the mandatory details to be submitted with the final report
  • SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTIONS – A FEW IDEAS 
  • Cr.P.C., 1973. Notes no.1: Understanding the Police Report, Investigation, and Court’s Duties in Criminal Cases
  • Section 153A IPC: To constitute an offence under section 153A IPC words spoken or written must create enmity between different groups

Further Study

POCSO: Evidentiary value of the victim girl

Omission to take photograph of vehicle by the I.O is not fatal TNPPDL Act

Victim rights.

After 45 years, the rape case has come to an end with the acquittal being set aside

POCSO COMPROMISE QUASH: Power under section 482 Cr. P.C could not be used to quash heinous offences based on compromise which has a serious impact on society

TAGGED:compromisejayachandran jjayashreejustice jayachandranpocso compromisepocso compromise petition dismissedsupreme court judgmentssupreme court judgments not citedvictimvictim wants to marry some other person
Previous Article Section 138: When transaction already is within N.I Act then the transaction does not come within section 4 of the Tamilnadu prohibition of charging exorbitant interest Act, 2003
Next Article Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940: If seller proves that he acquired the drug or cosmetic from a duly licensed manufacturer, distributor or dealer. He shall not be liable for a contravention of section18 of the Act
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

civil

Supreme Court Mandates Immediate Redistribution of Surplus Land in Landmark Judgment 

section1 December 19, 2024
Dowry death: Complainant displayed honesty by making allegations only against the appellant and not implicating other family members unnecessarily
Part departure in chief-examination is not necessary to declare the entire witness as hostile
POCSO or IPC?
Deprecated practice involving the relatives of husband for offence under section 498A IPC and section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961

Related Study

Section 138 NI Act: Cheque itself is a promise to pay even if the debt is barred by time
September 8, 2023
Murder case acquittal: How to appreciate Circumstantial evidence is explained
November 30, 2024
Class -1 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Introduction
June 12, 2023
Discharge: When specific remedy is available under section 397 Cr.P.C the CBI ought not to have filed petition under section 482 Cr.P.C
March 27, 2025
Directions issued to manage S. 138 NI Act cases effectively
April 5, 2025

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             © Paperpage Internet Services.                       All Rights Reserved.

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?