Discrepancy in the use of the complainant’s fingers (two or five) to pick up the demanded money from his pocket has some bearing while considering the entire evidence
Madras High Court: 14% of the disproportionate assets is inconsistent with the known sources of income thus conviction upheld
Quash: When the amount was fully settled by way of compromise before DRT lodging a complaint before CBI for fraud and forgery is an abuse of process of law
Hostile witness: Trustworthy portions of complainant cannot be eschewed even though he affirmed every suggestion made by the defence
Remember me
