Sign In
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal (Judge Rtd)
      • Ad. Ramprakash Rajagopal
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • Ad. James Raja
      • Ad. M.S.Parthiban
      • Ad. Rajavel
      • Ad. Azhar Basha
      • Mr. Lokkeshvaran
      • Prasath
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
    • Legal Drafting
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • E-Booklet
    • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Bail: Court can contemplate statements recorded under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C while deciding bail for the purpose of prima facie in grave offences
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • E-Booklet
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Quick Recall> Cr.P.C> Bail: Court can contemplate statements recorded under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C while deciding bail for the purpose of prima facie in grave offences

Bail: Court can contemplate statements recorded under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C while deciding bail for the purpose of prima facie in grave offences

Head note: High court did not consider sections u/s 161 and 164 Cr.P.C for considering prima facie in grave offences - Bail cancelled Leave granted.
Ramprakash Rajagopal December 20, 2023 6 Min Read
Share

This appeal is against an order dated 15th December, 2021 passed by the High Court of Allahabad granting bail to the respondent-accused who was arrested in connection with Crime Case No. 08 of 2019 under Sections 302, 201, 376 read with 120B of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 5 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) for alleged rape and murder of an eleven year old child being the daughter of the appellant.

Contents
PartiesFurther study

The offence alleged against the respondent-accused of rape and cold-blooded murder of an eleven year old child is heinous and dastardly. The conduct of killing a child to avoid getting caught of the offence, inter alia, of rape and then burial of the child as also her stained clothes and other articles under the soil to cause disappearance of evidence and evade apprehension for the offence of murder is indicative of a tendency to evade the process of law. It is possible that the respondent-accused might flee to evade the process of law.

The High Court has ignored the materials on record including incriminating statements of witnesses under Section 164/161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Statements under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. may not be admissible in evidence, but are relevant in considering the prima facie case against an accused in an application for grant of bail in case of grave offence.

The High Court has granted the respondent-accused bail, without considering the heinous nature of the allegations against him, the gravity of the offence alleged and severity of the punishment in the event of ultimate conviction, only because a co accused had also been granted bail by the High Court.

The impugned order of the High Court incorrectly states that bail is granted considering all facts and circumstances, nature of the allegations, gravity of the offence, severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused and the law laid down in Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P. & Ors. reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22. This has not been done. The impugned order evinces non-application of mind. In Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P.(supra), this Court held:

“2. There is no doubt that the grant or denial of bail is entirely the discretion of the judge considering a case but even so, the exercise of judicial discretion has been circumscribed by a large number of decisions rendered by this Court and by every High Court in the country. Yet, occasionally there is a necessity to introspect whether denying bail to an accused person is the right thing to do on the facts and in the circumstances of a case”.

The observations and directions in Dataram Singh (supra) were in the context of arrest and long custodial detention in a crime case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing cheques and then stopping payment of the cheque. Bail application had been rejected, first by the Trial Court and then by the High Court even after about five months of detention of the accused in custody.

If the High Court had seriously considered the gravity of the offence, there would have been some indication of what was the apparently extenuating circumstance, which entitled the respondent accused to bail. Ex facie, the allegations are grave, the punishment is severe and it cannot be said that there are no materials on record at all.

The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. The impugned order granting bail is set aside. It is however made clear that any observation made in this order will not affect the merits of the trial.

Parties

INDRESH KUMAR vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. … Respondent(s) – CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 938 OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4982 of 2022).

https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2022/12875/12875_2022_7_32_36306_Order_12-Jul-2022.pdf

Indresh Kumar vs. The State of U.P

Further study

Difference between cancellation of bail and appeal against bail already granted

Bail can be granted despite the presence of the accused, if he is in police custody

Bail order and reasons

No bail or bail cancelled; if witness(es) turned hostile?

Section 167 Cr.P.C and condition

How to cancel bond? Procedure explained

Article: Bail – Class.1 – A basic understanding_Ramprakash Rajagopal

Whether the same accused can be arrested and grant bail for new offence added in the FIR? Whether “Victim” has rights during bail?

Section 167(2) Cr.P.C – Default Bail and its Cancellation.

Further Study

Anticipatory Bail: Court is required to focus on the role attached to the accused whose application is under consideration

Not Rape: Though the marriage was solemnized by force the relationship between them was only after the marriage as such section 376 IPC does not emanate against the husband

How to cancel bond? Procedure explained

Bio-Medical Waste Rules: Transporting untreated Bio-Medical waste stored more than 48 hours should be stopped with iron hand.

PMLA: All the offences under the PMLA are cognizable and non-bailable

TAGGED:161 and 164 statementsbail and 161bail cancellationcancellation of bailconsideration of 161court can consider 161 and 164further studyfurther study on the subject
Previous Article PONMUDI MINISTER CASE: As per section 13(1)(e)P.C Act 1988, the person holding the properties on behalf of the public servant should also liable to explain the source
Next Article Default bail: Failure to produce the accused for extension of time for investigation and custody is in violation of Article 21
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

false recovery

Seizing material objects from the body of the accused and attempted to convert it as recovery is against the principle of section 27 IEA

Ramprakash Rajagopal December 18, 2025
Cheque cases courts need not summon the accused before taking cognizance since NI Act is a special enactment
Murder case: Acquittal: Not disclosing an important fact to the police assumes great importance and is highly suspicious
How to examine the witness through video conferencing is explained in this judgment but in a different way
Since no provocation nor blow stuck by mistake or accident section 300 Exception- 1 would not attract

Related Study

Guidelines issued on Prevention of violence against medical professionals and providing safe working conditions
August 22, 2024
Detailed analysis of the test identification parade
March 20, 2023
Murder appeal: Appeal against conviction of gruesome murder of children and causing disappearance of evidence
June 25, 2023
Settled: Under section 193 Cr.P.C the Court of Sessions has the power to summon a person as accused to stand trial even if he has not been charge-sheeted
August 8, 2025
No Sanction Quash: The appellant’s official duty would be in furtherance of the act and covered with section 197 Cr.P.C r/w 83 M.P Housing Board Act 1972
January 6, 2025
Whether I.O has to file final report even after comes to the opinion that there is no case made out? Yes
March 8, 2023
Suicide instigation should put in such position that the victim has no other option but to commit suicide
December 31, 2024
S. 303(2) BNS: Anticipatory Bail was filed for a bailable offence however the  Hon’ble High Court quashed the FIR
May 14, 2025
Section 4 Cr.P.C
August 18, 2023
Cognizance: To take cognizance under section 186 IPC procedure under section 195(1)(a)(i) of the Cr.P.C shall be followed
August 30, 2024

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?