Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal
      • AD. RAMPRAKASH RAJAGOPAL
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • James Raja
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • Legal words
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Bail: Court can contemplate statements recorded under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C while deciding bail for the purpose of prima facie in grave offences
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Quick Recall> Cr.P.C> Bail: Court can contemplate statements recorded under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C while deciding bail for the purpose of prima facie in grave offences

Bail: Court can contemplate statements recorded under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C while deciding bail for the purpose of prima facie in grave offences

Head note: High court did not consider sections u/s 161 and 164 Cr.P.C for considering prima facie in grave offences - Bail cancelled Leave granted.
Ramprakash Rajagopal December 20, 2023 6 Min Read
Share
Points
PartiesFurther study

This appeal is against an order dated 15th December, 2021 passed by the High Court of Allahabad granting bail to the respondent-accused who was arrested in connection with Crime Case No. 08 of 2019 under Sections 302, 201, 376 read with 120B of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 5 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) for alleged rape and murder of an eleven year old child being the daughter of the appellant.

The offence alleged against the respondent-accused of rape and cold-blooded murder of an eleven year old child is heinous and dastardly. The conduct of killing a child to avoid getting caught of the offence, inter alia, of rape and then burial of the child as also her stained clothes and other articles under the soil to cause disappearance of evidence and evade apprehension for the offence of murder is indicative of a tendency to evade the process of law. It is possible that the respondent-accused might flee to evade the process of law.

The High Court has ignored the materials on record including incriminating statements of witnesses under Section 164/161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Statements under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. may not be admissible in evidence, but are relevant in considering the prima facie case against an accused in an application for grant of bail in case of grave offence.

The High Court has granted the respondent-accused bail, without considering the heinous nature of the allegations against him, the gravity of the offence alleged and severity of the punishment in the event of ultimate conviction, only because a co accused had also been granted bail by the High Court.

The impugned order of the High Court incorrectly states that bail is granted considering all facts and circumstances, nature of the allegations, gravity of the offence, severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused and the law laid down in Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P. & Ors. reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22. This has not been done. The impugned order evinces non-application of mind. In Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P.(supra), this Court held:

“2. There is no doubt that the grant or denial of bail is entirely the discretion of the judge considering a case but even so, the exercise of judicial discretion has been circumscribed by a large number of decisions rendered by this Court and by every High Court in the country. Yet, occasionally there is a necessity to introspect whether denying bail to an accused person is the right thing to do on the facts and in the circumstances of a case”.

The observations and directions in Dataram Singh (supra) were in the context of arrest and long custodial detention in a crime case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing cheques and then stopping payment of the cheque. Bail application had been rejected, first by the Trial Court and then by the High Court even after about five months of detention of the accused in custody.

If the High Court had seriously considered the gravity of the offence, there would have been some indication of what was the apparently extenuating circumstance, which entitled the respondent accused to bail. Ex facie, the allegations are grave, the punishment is severe and it cannot be said that there are no materials on record at all.

The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. The impugned order granting bail is set aside. It is however made clear that any observation made in this order will not affect the merits of the trial.

Parties

INDRESH KUMAR vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. … Respondent(s) – CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 938 OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4982 of 2022).

https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2022/12875/12875_2022_7_32_36306_Order_12-Jul-2022.pdf

Indresh Kumar vs. The State of U.P

Further study

Difference between cancellation of bail and appeal against bail already granted

Bail can be granted despite the presence of the accused, if he is in police custody

Bail order and reasons

No bail or bail cancelled; if witness(es) turned hostile?

Section 167 Cr.P.C and condition

How to cancel bond? Procedure explained

Article: Bail – Class.1 – A basic understanding_Ramprakash Rajagopal

Whether the same accused can be arrested and grant bail for new offence added in the FIR? Whether “Victim” has rights during bail?

Section 167(2) Cr.P.C – Default Bail and its Cancellation.

Subject Study

  • BIRD’S EYE VIEW ON THE TESTIMONY OF CHILD WITNESS IN CRIMINAL TRIAL
  • Punishing a person even without proper identity is against Article-21
  • Must have judgment for defense counsels: Prosecution cannot prove a fact during trial through witness which was not stated to the police during investigation
  • In NPDS cases confession is hit under section 25 Indian Evidence Act
  • Whether the investigation officer (station house officer) can foreclose the information before and after investigation?
  • Cr.P.C., 1973. Notes no.5: General Provisions as to Inquiries and Trials – Part.3 (Duties of parties)
  • Multiple firs quash procedure
  • Reversal of acquittal: Procedure explained

Further Study

Murder case acquittal: Alcohol presence is in the body and chance of fell from a grown high tree

Recall witness: Petitioner did not file defer petition nor assigned any reasons in the petition.

Section 145 Evidence Act: No court should allow a witness to be contradicted by reference to the previous statement in writing or reduced to writing unless the the procedure set out in section145 of the Evidence Act

Sudden provocation: Not a premeditated murder or the appellant had the intention to commit the murder.

Cr.P.C., 1973. Notes no.5: General Provisions as to Inquiries and Trials – Part.3 (Duties of parties)

TAGGED:161 and 164 statementsbail and 161bail cancellationcancellation of bailconsideration of 161court can consider 161 and 164further studyfurther study on the subject
Previous Article PONMUDI MINISTER CASE: As per section 13(1)(e)P.C Act 1988, the person holding the properties on behalf of the public servant should also liable to explain the source
Next Article Default bail: Failure to produce the accused for extension of time for investigation and custody is in violation of Article 21
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

rash and negligence

After the accident vehicle caused the accident dragged in high speed about 15 feet hence the act of rash and negligence proved

Ramprakash Rajagopal January 2, 2025
Constitutional courts are fully empowered to direct for CBI investigation but not on the basis of “ifs” and “buts”
Employer-Employee: Complaint (employee) does not indicate that the appellants (employers) used filthy language
Portions contradicted with the previous statement can be put in bracket and marked as Exhibit AA, BB, e.t.c
Don’t mention as Lower courts: Acquittal based on the affidavits filed by the eyewitness in Court

Related Study

Alibi: Accused must prove the alibi after getting answer from the witness that the accused was not in police station
March 6, 2025
Section 195(1)(b)(ii) would be attracted only when the document was in the custodia legis (custody of the law) and not otherwise
April 8, 2025
Bail: Court can contemplate statements recorded under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C while deciding bail for the purpose of prima facie in grave offences
December 20, 2023
Judicial officers are advised to take advantage of section 313 (5) Cr.P.C by getting advice from P.P and defence counsels at the state of questioning under section 313 Cr.P.C
May 12, 2023
A timeless guidance of Hon’ble Madras High Court for young generation to stay away from pornography
January 13, 2024

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             © Paperpage Internet Services.                       All Rights Reserved.

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?