Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal
      • AD. RAMPRAKASH RAJAGOPAL
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • James Raja
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • Legal words
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: As per Tamil Nadu Liquor (Possession for Personal Consumption) Rules, 1996, a person is entitled to possess 4.5 litres of Indian made foreign spirits
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Quick Recall> Cr.P.C> As per Tamil Nadu Liquor (Possession for Personal Consumption) Rules, 1996, a person is entitled to possess 4.5 litres of Indian made foreign spirits

As per Tamil Nadu Liquor (Possession for Personal Consumption) Rules, 1996, a person is entitled to possess 4.5 litres of Indian made foreign spirits

Head note: Hon’ble Madras High Court - Justice Nirmal Kumar J - Return of Property - Alcohol - TN Prohibition Act - Petitioner was found in possession of Copper - Brandy bottles each containing 180 ml of brandy in total 720 ml of brandy - As per TN Liquor (Possession for Personal consumption) Rules, 1996, a person is entitled to possess 405 litres of Indian made foreign spirits - Hence, the case against the petitioner itself questionable one - Hon’ble Directed to release the vehicle.
Ramprakash Rajagopal December 7, 2023 5 Min Read
Share
Points
FACTSDIRECTION TO RETURN THE VEHICLE (PROPERTY) ON CONDITIONS

FACTS

2. The petitioner, who is the owner of TVS Star City Plus BS III bearing Registration No.TN-50-Q-8823, filed a return of property petition in Cr.M.P.No.3175 of 2023 before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam, who dismissed the same by an order dated 01.07.2023, against which, the present petition has been filed.

xxx

3. The contention of the petitioner is that the respondent police registered a case against the petitioner for offence under Section 4(1)(a) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act in Crime No.392 of 2023 on 31.05.2023 on the allegation that the petitioner was found in possession of Copper – 4 Brandy bottles each containing 180 ml of brandy.

xxx

7. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material it is seen that the petitioner was found in possession of Copper – 4 brandy bottles each containing 180 ml, totally 720 ml of brandy. As per Tamil Nadu Liquor (Possession for Personal Consumption) Rules, 1996, a person is entitled to possess 4.5 litres of Indian made foreign spirits. In view of this admitted position, the case against the petitioner is a questionable one. Thus detention of vehicle by the respondent police is not proper.

8. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle, viz., TVS Star City plus BS III bearing No.TN-50-Q-8823. It is seen that from the date of registration of FIR, the vehicle is kept in open space and thereby, the value of the vehicle is getting diminished. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of “Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Versus State of Gujarat reported in 2002 10 SCC 290”, had given guidelines in the cases of return of property to the owner.

9. Further, this Court in the case of “Sakthidevi Versus State by The Inspector of Police, Thittachery Police Station, Nagapattinam District in Crl.R.C.No.501 of 2011”, considered the case of “David Vs. Sakthivel, Inspector of Police-cum-Station House Officer reported in 2010 1 MLJ (Crl.) 929” and ordered return of seized vehicle to the owner, which is being consistently followed, despite initiation of the confiscation proceedings.

xxx

11. In view of the aforesaid reasons, this court is inclined to set aside the order passed by the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam made in Cr.M.P.No.3175 of 2023, dated 01.07.2023 and accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed.

DIRECTION TO RETURN THE VEHICLE (PROPERTY) ON CONDITIONS

12. Since the vehicle is in possession of the respondent police, the respondent police is directed to return the vehicle TVS Star City plus BS III bearing No.TN-50-Q-8823 to the petitioner, on the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsifcum-Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam;

(ii) The petitioner shall produce the original RC Book of the vehicle and other relevant records to prove his ownership. The learned Magistrate shall peruse the RC book and other records, retain xerox copy of the same and return the same to the petitioner with a view to use the vehicle;

(iii) The petitioner shall not alter or alienate the vehicle in any manner till adjudication is over;

(iv) The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that he will not use the vehicle for any illegal activities in future and also to produce the vehicle as and when required by the respondent and by the court below and as well as by the District Collector of the District or authorized officer in that behalf by the Government.

(v) The petitioner shall participate in the confiscation proceedings if any initiated and shall produce the vehicle before the confiscation authority. This order is subject to the outcome of the confiscation proceedings.

PARTY: Sathiyaraj … Petitioner Vs. The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Nannilam Police Station, Nannilam, Thiruvarur District. … Respondent – Crl.R.C.No.1819 of 2023 – DATED: 01.11.2023 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/1083410

Sathiyaraj vs The State

Further study on the subject

Return of Property – Vehicle – Section. 451 – Court & Confiscating Authority roles – Explained.

Subject Study

  • Automatic vacation of stay: Asian Resurfacing judgment resurfaced
  • Murder: What is ‘cruel’ under exception 4 of section 300 IPC?
  • Cr.P.C., 1973. Notes no.6: General Introduction to Inquiries and Trials – Part.4 (Criminal courts powers & administration)
  • NDPS Act: Confession statement: Statement recorded under section 67 of NDPS Act is hit under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India
  • Jurisdiction: Magistrate is empowered to entertain complaint even has no jurisdiction
  • Section 395 IPC: Dacoity: Since there is no minimum sentence prescribed under section 395 IPC sentence reduced to already undergone
  • No private funding in police investigation
  • High Court or Sessions court should be very slow in granting stay of order granting bail and should not grant exparte stay of the order granting bail

Further Study

Appreciation of evidence: It is only after the prosecution discharges its initial burden beyond all reasonable doubt the false explanation or non-explanation could be taken into consideration

Cr.P.C., 1973. Notes no.1: Understanding the Police Report, Investigation, and Court’s Duties in Criminal Cases

Return of Property – Vehicle – Section. 451 – Court & Confiscating Authority roles – Explained.

PMLA: All the offences under the PMLA are cognizable and non-bailable

NDPS Act: Mere owner of the vehicle carrying contraband shall not be an accused

TAGGED:4.5 litres alcohol allowedalcoholconsuming alcoholdisposal of propertyfurther studylordship nirmal kumarnirmal jprivate person alcohol consumingprohibitionreturn of propertyTN liquor rulesTN prohibition Actvehiclevehicle return of property
Previous Article Sudden provocation: Overt act of killing the deceased happened during a fit of anger in the heat of a passionate verbal quarrel and would fall under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
Next Article Section 498A IPC: Unless there is threatening to marital life no other materials are sufficient to implicate a person for cruelty.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

section 174A IPC

Section 174A IPC [section 209 BNS 2023] is a stand alone, independent and substantive offence that can continue even if the proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is extinguished

Ramprakash Rajagopal January 3, 2025
CBI had the authority to investigate offences involving Central Government employees under a Central Act without needing state consent
Section 204 Cr.P.C: No need to issue summons first; the accused’s attendance can best be secured at the court’s discretion by issuing a bailable or non-bailable warrant
Natural justice must be followed before impounding passport under section 10(3) Passports Act, 1967
Evolution of FIR Registration with Comparative analysis of CrPC Sections 154 & 156(3) and BNSS sections 173 & 175(3)

Related Study

Case diary: Section 172(3) Cr.P.C: The accused has a right to cross-examine police officer as per section 145 Evidence Act whenever the police officer uses it to refresh his memory
March 8, 2024
Section 306 IPC [s.45 BNS]: Duty of realising outstanding loans for employer cannot be said to have instigated to commit suicide
January 19, 2025
Defence can rely on the unmarked document filed by the prosecution
November 17, 2024
Dying declaration: Though there are inconsistencies and improvements in the witnesses statements dying declaration corroborated with medical evidence has proved the guilt of the accused
June 1, 2024
Rape: Physical relationship with woman promises to marry her is misconception and consent is immaterial
January 31, 2024

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             © Paperpage Internet Services.                       All Rights Reserved.

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?