Sign In
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal (Judge Rtd)
      • Ad. Ramprakash Rajagopal
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • Ad. James Raja
      • Ad. M.S.Parthiban
      • Ad. Rajavel
      • Ad. Azhar Basha
      • Mr. Lokkeshvaran
      • Prasath
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
    • Legal Drafting
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • E-Booklet
    • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Bio-Medical Waste Rules: Transporting untreated Bio-Medical waste stored more than 48 hours should be stopped with iron hand.
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • E-Booklet
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Quick Recall> Cr.P.C> Bio-Medical Waste Rules: Transporting untreated Bio-Medical waste stored more than 48 hours should be stopped with iron hand.

Bio-Medical Waste Rules: Transporting untreated Bio-Medical waste stored more than 48 hours should be stopped with iron hand.

Head note: Madras High Court - Transporting untreated Bio-Medical waste stored more than 48 hours should be stopped with iron hand - Trial judge without considered all the aspects and erroneously passed the impugned order to release the vehicle.
Ramprakash Rajagopal December 11, 2023 7 Min Read
Share
PRAYER

Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and to set aside the order of the learned the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Alangulam, Tenkasi District, dated 02.08.2023 in Cr.M.P.No.4751 of 2023.

Contents
PRAYERFactsManagement of Bio-Medical waste and how to dispose?Following Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India – (1996) 5 SCC 281Conclusion
Facts

The petitioner filed a case against the respondent and other accused for the offence under Sections 294(b), 353, 506(ii), 269 & 270 IPC r/w Rule 4 of the Bio-medical Waste Management Rules, 2016 and Rule 8 of Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, with the allegation that on 27.05.2023 at 3.30 p.m, they transported the bio-medical waste in the vehicle bearing Registration No.KL21U3709 from Kerala State and dumped into the defacto complainant’s village namely, Kuruvankottai in Alangulam-Tirunelveli Road, as against the Rule 8 of the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016 and Rule 4 of Bio-medical Waste Management Rules, 2016. The same was questioned by the defacto complainant namely, the Health Inspector. The respondent and other accused criminally intimidated and caused obstruction in discharge of his duties. After ascertaining the transportation of the said bio-medical waste, the defacto complainant seized the vehicle with the help of the public and entrusted the same with the respondent police. Thereafter, the case was registered for the above offences. They also seized the vehicle and produced the same before the jurisdictional Magistrate Court.

2. The respondent, owner of the said vehicle filed the Cr.M.P.No. 4751 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam under Section 451 of Cr.P.C, to seek the interim custody of the said vehicle. The learned Judicial Magistrate allowed the application vide impugned order, dated 02.08.2023, by imposing condition. Challenging the same, the Inspector of Police filed this revision to set aside the order.

6. This Court has considered the rival submissions made by both parties and perused the records and the impugned order and also the relevant provision of the Bio-medical Waste Management Rules, 2016.

7. The respondent’s vehicle transported the bio-medical waste from the Kerala State and attempted to dump the said waste in a place of Kuruvankottai, Alangulam-Tirunelveli Road on 27.05.2023 at 3.30 p.m. The same was questioned by the village people and the defacto complainant. The defacto complainant is the Health Inspector of the said area. At that time, the respondent and other accused abused the defacto complainant and caused hindrance to the recovery of the said bio-medical waste and abused him and criminally intimidated him. Thereafter, the respondent and other accused were caught by the public and produced before the petitioner herein. The police registered the case for the above offences and seized the bio-medical waste and destructed the same in the Aspetic Systems Bio Medical Waste Management Company at the cost of Rs.2,67,211/-. Thereafter, the respondent’s prayer seeking the interim custody of the vehicle was ordered by the learned trial Judge.

Management of Bio-Medical waste and how to dispose?

8. The bio-medical waste must be properly managed and disposed of to protect the environment as well as the general public, who are at the risk of exposure to bio-medical waste. Considering the health hazard issue relating to the improper management of the bio-medical waste, the Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules, 2016 was introduced. They indirectly recognised the practice of the polluter pay principle. The main object of the Bio-medical Waste Management Rules, 2016 to segregate, transport, treatment and dispose of correctly. The above are as important as patient care.

9. Untreated bio-medical waste shall not be kept stored beyond a period of 48 hours. In said circumstances, transporting the same itself demands iron hand to stop the same. In spite of that restriction, the respondent transported the bio-medical waste with huge quantity and hence, the learned trial Judge committed error in granting the custody of the vehicle to the respondent. The Rule itself specifically prohibits transportation of the bio-medical waste beyond 75 kms from the hospitals. In the said circumstances, the respondent seriously violated the said Rule and transported the bio-medical waste with knowledge that the same would cause hazards to the public and the environment. This type of act should not be encouraged by releasing the vehicle involved. The respondent not only acted contrary to the Bio-medical Waste Rules, 2016 but also against the injunction order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court. The learned trial Judge has not considered all the aspects and erroneously passed the impugned order to release the vehicle. Hence, this Court, on the above reasoning, set aside the impugned order dated 02.08.2023.

xxx

Following Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India – (1996) 5 SCC 281

14. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the above case, has also reminded the duty of the High Court to control the degradation of the environment and to stop illegal activities with great responsibilities to ensure the proper implementation of the environmental laws, as per the provisions of the Act.

15. The Hon’ble Supreme Court specifically directed the High Court to monitor the implementation of the provisions of the Pollution Act in order to protect the environment and related health hazards.

Conclusion

18. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Petition is allowed with the above direction. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

State Rep. by, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Tenkasi District. (Cr.No.146 of 2023) Revision Petitioner/Petitioner/ Complainant Vs. R.S.Rajeesh .. Respondent / Petitioner / 3rd Accused – Crl.R.C (MD) No.957 of 2023 and Crl.M.P (MD) No.12436 of 2023 – Pronounced on : 15.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/913257

bio medical case

Further study on the subject

Return of property – section 451 – Court & Confiscating Authority roles – Explained

Omission to take photograph of vehicle by the I.O is not fatal in TNPPDL Act

As per Tamil Nadu Liquor (Possession for personal consumption) Rules, 1996, a person is entitled to possess 4.5 litres of Indian made foreign spirits. 

 

Further Study

In money claim matters appropriate ownership of the sum of money can be determined only after all the evidence is taken and not at the stage of FIR

Sudden provocation: Not a premeditated murder or the appellant had the intention to commit the murder.

Recall witness: Petitioner did not file defer petition nor assigned any reasons in the petition.

If the prosecution failed to prove the identity of seized gold the accused is not liable to prove lawful acquisition of gold

Disbelieving dying declaration: Both dying declarations were said to have given to the interested witnesses and not properly proved

TAGGED:451bio wastefurther studyfurther study on the subjectjustice k.k.ramakrishnanreturn of propertysectionuntreaded bio wastevehicle used for transporting bio-wastewaste
Previous Article Murder case acquittal: Strangulation established but failed to connect the accused with the crime
Next Article Recall witness: Petitioner did not file defer petition nor assigned any reasons in the petition.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

partnership firm

Complaint filed under section 138 N.I Act is maintainable even Partnership Firm is not named as accused

Ramprakash Rajagopal July 19, 2025
Suspension of sentence should be considered by the appellate court liberally in fixed-term sentence unless there are exceptional circumstances
Quash: NI Act: If the notice amount is different from the cheque amount then cheque proceedings are bad in law and the defence of typographical error is irrelevant
The offence under Section 195A IPC is a cognizable offence so the power of the police to take action in relation thereto under Sections 154 CrPC and 156 CrPC cannot be doubted
Acquittal: Though circumstantial evidence casts doubt on the homicide committed by the accused but the same is inconclusive without any corroborative evidence and based on mere last seen together

Related Study

Section 306 IPC [s.45 BNS]: Duty of realising outstanding loans for employer cannot be said to have instigated to commit suicide
January 19, 2025
Acquittal: Trap case: Witness entered the room only after the complainant’s signal, meaning they did not witness the actual transaction also the amount was scattered in the floor next to the accused
March 14, 2025
PC Act: FIR quash: High Court would not have entered into the observation that there is no direct evidence for the demand for bribe
April 29, 2024
SC/ST Act: As per FIR accused insulted the complainant inside his office hence does not come within public view
February 5, 2025
Cancellation of bail: Cancelling the bail which granted by another single judge by examining the merits tantamount to judicial impropriety/indiscipline
February 24, 2024
Quash: Appellant’s possession of buttondar knife was for any of the prohibited categories as indicated in the DAD Notification and hence quashed
December 7, 2024
The Tamil Nadu Rent Act, 2017 Needs Constitutional Correction
December 8, 2025
POCSO Bail: Direction to file an affidavit to marry the girl after she attains majority
March 11, 2023
Defence counsels don’t worry I teach you to take defence
January 12, 2026
Since no provocation nor blow stuck by mistake or accident section 300 Exception- 1 would not attract
October 19, 2025

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?