Supreme court quashes fir in property dispute emphasizes civil in nature and held it is impossible to appreciate how appellant deceived the respondent
Mere contradictions would not make the entire story of prosecution false [Falsus in uno falsus in omnibus explained]
No Sanction Quash: The appellant’s official duty would be in furtherance of the act and covered with section 197 Cr.P.C r/w 83 M.P Housing Board Act 1972
High Court would be justified in quashing the proceedings if the allegations taken in its entirety do not prima facie constitute a case against the accused
Remember me
