Neither the State nor the Victim nor the Complainant had sought enhancement in appeal but the High Court converted the sentence into a conviction of the accused in a suo-motu revision is illegal
NDPS: Mere non-compliance or delayed compliance with section 52-A is not fatal unless irregularity affecting the integrity of the seized substance
Witness did not name any person from the locality who had seen the incident and not a single witness from the locality was examined who had seen the incident
Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) directed the witnesses to pay rs.10 lakh as compensation to the accused in NDPS case for giving false evidence against him
Remember me
