NDPS: Mere non-compliance or delayed compliance with section 52-A is not fatal unless irregularity affecting the integrity of the seized substance
Witness did not name any person from the locality who had seen the incident and not a single witness from the locality was examined who had seen the incident
Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) directed the witnesses to pay rs.10 lakh as compensation to the accused in NDPS case for giving false evidence against him
A confessional FIR given by one accused cannot be used against the other accused including the maker further contents of such FIR cannot be read in evidence
Remember me
