Trial court cannot appreciate inconsistencies in witness testimonies while summoning additional accused under section 319 Cr.P.C
The Hon’ble Supreme Court suggested that the main accused’s abscondence is a subconscious acceptance of his guilt
Quarrel does not constitute a criminal offence and cannot by itself sustain cognizance of the offences
Recovery of weapons of assault is not the sine qua non for convicting the accused since the four eye-witnesses versions corroborated
Remember me
