Must have:

Category: General

  • All Post
    •   Back
Juvenile Justice Act, 2015: Though offences POCSO and Murder have been proved accused acquitted based on procedural illegalities

-March 30, 2024

Challenge against the dismissal of criminal appeal by the Hon’ble High Court - Observation of the Trial court after the conviction - Child was not returned home from a shop and could not be traced hence fir registered - Victim (deceased) was last found with accused - Accused confessed and based on that dead body recovered and after post-mortem it…

When chief-examination of Prosecution witness is being recorded presence of accused advocate is required to object to a leading or irrelevant question being asked to the witness

-March 30, 2024

Charge against the appellants are under sections 419, 420 of IPC and sections 66 read with 43 (j) and 66D of IT Act. Trial judge recorded 12 Prosecution witnesses Chief-examination without recording their cross-examination. Trial proceeded as per the direction of the Hon’ble Madras High court but appellants did not engage any advocate. Trial court ought to have provided legal…

Circumstantial evidence: Merely appellants were seen nearby the place where the crime occurred holding chopper is not last seen

-March 22, 2024

Circumstantial evidence: Merely appellants were seen nearby the place where the crime occurred holding chopper is not last seen. General principles regarding the innocence of accused. Witness did not say that the accused were seen nearby the dead body. Recovery is from open place accessible to one and all. Accused aquitted.

Sentence modified into section 304 part II: Deceased died when appellant fired in the open sky in a marriage ceremony though unfortunate but having no enmity and intention

-March 12, 2024

Section 304 Part II deals with culpable homicide not amounting to murder. In this case, the deceased tragically lost his life when the appellant, without any malice or premeditation, fired a gunshot into the sky during a joyous wedding ceremony. Hon'ble Supreme court has concluded that though it is cruel act but without any intention or enmity and modified the…

Section 451 / 457 Cr.P.C: Return of Property: There is no bar to release the property in NDPS Act

-March 11, 2024

After reviewing the submissions, it is confirmed that the petitioner is the vehicle owner and not involved in the case. The vehicle was rented out to A1/Balamurugan, with no contraband found. Due to the vehicle being exposed to weather since seizure, further detention could damage it. Citing the Apex Court's decision in a similar case, the Court is inclined to…

Custody of child in Mohammaden Law: No system of adoption of child in Mohammaden law: Custody of children is the welfare of children and not the right of their parents

-March 8, 2024

Against the order passed by the Hisgh Court in a Writ Petition- No system of adoption of child in Mohammaden law. It is only Kafalah, in terms of which only custody can be given to another person, however, the child does not sever relations with biological parents - custody of a minor child in parens patriae jurisdiction - Time gap…

Approver: Evidence of approver can be admitted even he did not inculpate himself with the crime

-February 29, 2024

Since the approver did not inculpate himself with the privy of the crime, the Hon'ble High court dismissed the approver's testimony, set aside the death sentence conviction, and acquitted the respondents. But Hon’ble Supreme court after discussed sections 133, 157 Evidence Act and section 306 Cr.P.C has concluded that once the approver is being removed from the category of co-accused…

Procedure: Sample collection: Assistant Director has no power to seize the sample of meat under Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle preservation Act 1964

-February 28, 2024

The main issue is that the Assistant Director, who was not legally authorised to take the sample, voluntarily took the meat sample. He also did not issue notice to first three respondents. As a result, Apex Court confirmed the Hon’ble High Court’s order quashing the FIR finding the Assistant Director's sample collection act was entirely unlawful.

Cancellation of bail: Cancelling the bail which granted by another single judge by examining the merits tantamount to judicial impropriety/indiscipline

-February 24, 2024

Head note: Challenge against the order cancelling the bail application - Appellants were added solely on the basis of confessional statements - State preferred cancellation of regular bail - Cancellation of bail came before the single judge who had not granted the bail - Cancelling the bail which granted by another single judge by examining the merits tantamount to judicial…

Load More

End of Content.

TRENDING

  • All Post
  • Acquittal
  • Articles
  • Class
  • Cr.P.C 1973
  • Digest
  • Latest
  • Legal Problems Q & A
  • Monthly Digest
  • Notes
  • Quick Recall
  • Recall
  • Resources
  • Thirukkural
  • Uncategorized
    •   Back
    • 138
    • IPC
    • Pocso
    • 482
    •   Back
    • Ad. Karunanithi
    • AD. RAMPRAKASH RAJAGOPAL
    • AD. KARUPPSAMY PANDIYAN
    • P.G.Rajagopal
    • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
    •   Back
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Land grabbing
    •   Back
    • Cr.P.C
    • Evidence Class
    •   Back
    • Crimes
    •   Back
    • POCSO
    • Dying Declaration
    • Murder
    •   Back
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
    •   Back
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • 138
    • IPC
    • Pocso
    • 482
    •   Back
    • weekly digest

Subscribe For More!

Get the latest and creative news updates on criminal law...

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

Disclaimer:

Contents of this Web Site are for general information or use only. They do not constitute any advice and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any personal or public decision. We hereby exclude any warranty, express or implied, as to the quality, accuracy, timeliness, completeness, performance, fitness for a particular page of the Site or any of its contents, including (but not limited) to any financial contents within the Site. We will not be liable for any damages (including, without limitation, damages for loss of business projects, or loss of profits) arising in contract, tort or otherwise from the use of or inability to use the site or any of its contents, or from any action taken (or refrained from being taken) as a result of using the Site or any of its contents. We shall give no warranty that the contents of the Site are free from infection by viruses or anything else which has contaminating or destructive user’s properties though we care to maintain the site virus/malware-free.

For further reading visit our ‘About‘ page.

© 2023 Developed and maintained by PAPERPAGE INTERNET SERVICES

Crypto wallet - Game Changer

Questions explained agreeable preferred strangers too him beautiful her son.