Sign In
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal (Judge Rtd)
      • Ad. Ramprakash Rajagopal
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • Ad. James Raja
      • Ad. M.S.Parthiban
      • Ad. Rajavel
      • Ad. Azhar Basha
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • E-Booklet
    • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Section 304A IPC: Awarding sentence under section 304 A IPC is not mandatory
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • E-Booklet
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Quick Recall> IPC> Section 304A IPC: Awarding sentence under section 304 A IPC is not mandatory

Section 304A IPC: Awarding sentence under section 304 A IPC is not mandatory

After the compensation settled down between the deceased family and the accused, the deceased family informed that the court may show lenient view on the appellant and hence the Hon’ble Supreme court has set aside the sentence by already undergone and released the appellant.
Ramprakash Rajagopal May 28, 2024 3 Min Read
Share
304A ipc sentence not mandatory
Points
Family of the deceased after receiving the compensation requested court to take lenient view for appellantAwarding sentence under section 304 A IPC is not mandatoryPartyFurther study section 304A IPC

Assailing the judgment dated 08th April, 2022, passed by the High Court confirming the conviction of the appellant for the charge under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’ for brevity) and directing to undergo sentence of six months with amount of fine of Rs.5000/and in default, to undergo two months simple imprisonment, the appellant is before us. The appellant was granted exemption from surrendering vide this Court’s order dated 29.07.2022.

 …… x ……

Family of the deceased after receiving the compensation requested court to take lenient view for appellant

In view of the aforesaid, it is clear that the family of the deceased, after receiving a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/­ (Rupees Two Lakhs) towards compensation requested the Court to take a lenient view in favour of the appellant who is said to be a person of good conduct.  It is also stated that by such an act, the soul of the deceased would feel happy.

Awarding sentence under section 304 A IPC is not mandatory

We have gone through the provisions of Section 304A IPC whereby the award of sentence is not mandatory. In the present case, appellant has paid a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/. However, considering the willingness of the family of the deceased, we reduce the sentence to the sentence already undergone and to the payment of compensation as recorded hereinabove.

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the appellant stands allowed in part; while maintaining his conviction under Section 304A IPC, the sentence is reduced as directed hereinabove, modifying the impugned judgment.

Party

HANUMANTHAPPA Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Respondent(s) – CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1194 OF 2023 – May 16, 2024.

Hanumanthappa-vs.-The-state-of-karnataka198582022_2024-05-16

https://www.sci.gov.in/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=get_court_pdf&diary_no=198582022&type=o&order_date=2024-05-16&from=latest_judgements_order

Further study section 304A IPC
  • Juvenile Justice Act, 2015: Though offences POCSO and Murder have been proved accused acquitted based on procedural illegalities
  • SECTION 41 Cr.P.C – ARREST IS THE PREROGATIVE OF POLICE AND NOT MANDATORY EVEN AFTER DISMISSAL OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL
  • Class 2 – Principles on Sentencing Policy & Victim Compensation
  • SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY OF SECTION 357(2) Cr.P.C
  • BAIL – NO INTERIM COMPENSATION

Subject Study

  • Non-explanation of injuries sustained by the accused is fatal to the prosecution
  • Pre-Arrest bail and conditions: No impossible and Impracticable conditions shall be imposed while granting Anticipatory bail
  • Section 138 N.I Act: Time barred debt or not itself a prima facie for evidence and cannot invoke section 482 cr.p.c to quash the same
  • Appreciation of evidence: It is only after the prosecution discharges its initial burden beyond all reasonable doubt the false explanation or non-explanation could be taken into consideration
  • WhatsApp status: Criticizing abrogation of Article 370 in J&K is protected under freedom of speech (Article 19(1)(a)) and does not violate section 153A IPC
  • Whether first complaint is maintainable if second complaint for dishonour of cheques based on compromise deed filed?
  • Burden of proof: Section 106 IEA: Unless the prosecution has proved the initial burden the accused need not invoke section 106 Indian Evidence Act
  • Murder case acquittal

Further Study

PMLA: All the offences under the PMLA are cognizable and non-bailable

Bail: Court can contemplate statements recorded under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C while deciding bail for the purpose of prima facie in grave offences

Cross-Examination: Disallowing questions in cross-examination will prejudice the accused

Conviction: Witnesses cannot expected to remember the timing correctly after six years from the incident

Section 498A IPC: Unless there is threatening to marital life no other materials are sufficient to implicate a person for cruelty.

TAGGED:304Afurther studyfurther study 304A
Previous Article Ratio decidendi: Failing to inform the accused of the grounds of arrest, denying the opportunity to defend through counsel, and failing to provide information about the proposed remand is unconstitutional
Next Article Dying declaration: Though there are inconsistencies and improvements in the witnesses statements dying declaration corroborated with medical evidence has proved the guilt of the accused
1 Comment
  • Pingback: MONTHLY CRIMINAL CASE LAWS DIGEST MAY'2024 - section1.in

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

dna

Since the DNA report points the possibility of another individual impregnated the victim than accused final report is quashed and re-investigation ordered with certain directions

Reshma Azath July 10, 2025
Direction issued: Appeal against acquittal in N.I Acts has to file before District Courts and Special Leave is not necessary
Stop saying custody death or custody murder Ajith kumar’s case is a murder and no prefix is attached to it
Sanction not necessary for the public servants who have conspired and issued patta in favour of some other person other than the property owner
Section 8 of the Goa Children’s Act 2003 intent is to protect children against serious forms of abuse and not to criminalise minor

Related Study

Though conviction shall not be based on an extra-judicial confession but in the case on hand the prosecution has proved the murder through other evidence beyond all reasonable doubts
September 15, 2025
Detailed analysis of the test identification parade
March 20, 2023
Terrorist Act: Bail is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution even for Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (SHOMA KANTI SEN)
April 11, 2024
Burden of proof (section 106 Evidence Act) and explaining circumstance and (section 313 Cr.P.C)
October 9, 2023
No moral conviction: Unless the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment or in connection with demand of dowry soon before her death presumption under section 113A IEA cannot be invoked
February 4, 2025

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?