Must have:

Category: IPC

  • All Post
    •   Back
Not Rape: Though the marriage was solemnized by force the relationship between them was only after the marriage as such section 376 IPC does not emanate against the husband

-January 18, 2024

Head note: Challenge – Facts - The appellant and complainant were in relationship against their parents wish - Father of the girl filed Habeas Corpus writ petition - Hon’ble High court’s order based on its interaction with the girl - After a considerable time complainant (girl) separated from appellant and register the FIR against him – Analysis - Complainant (girl)…

Voluntarily causing Grievous hurt: Bald statement against the accused that ‘they beat me up’ without supporting material does not cover section 323 ipc

-January 3, 2024

Head note: Apex court: Appeal - Facts - Chargesheet does not contain necessary ingredients for the offence informed - High court must have exercised power under section 482 cr.p.c against the bald accusation - Bald statement against the accused that ‘they beat me up’ without supporting material does not cover section 323 ipc - Section 384 ipc ingredients not found…

Murder case acquittal: Strangulation established but failed to connect the accused with the crime

-December 10, 2023

Madras High Court after thorough analysis of the trial court judgment has converted the Life sentence (conviction) into acquittal - Death by strangulation established by the prosecution but failed to connect the accused and the crime - Though the Hon’ble Division Bench has set aside the conviction, sustained the compensation awarded to the deceased’s daughter. Criminal Appeal

Quash: SC/ST and section 307 IPC case set up by the prosecution does not reveal the offences

-December 3, 2023

Head note: Apex Court – Discharge petition u/s 227 Cr.P.C has been filed by the accused for section 14A(1) SC/ST Act - IPC offences were also added in the FIR – Apex court after perusing the records has held that there is no offence traceable for SC/ST or offence for ten years under IPC – Hence, SC/ST charge quashed and…

Section 34 IPC: To attract common intention Co-Accused need not have engaged in discussion or agreement for conspiracy

-December 3, 2023

Head note: Apex Court - Common intention does not mean that the co-accused persons should have engaged in any discussion or agreement so as to prepare a plan or hatch a conspiracy for committing the offence - common intention is a psychological fact and it can be formed a minute before the actual happening of the incidence or as stated…

SECTION 299 IPC – CULPABLE HOMICIDE EXPLAINED

-July 23, 2023

The phraseology of Sections 299 and 300 respectively of the IPC leaves no manner of doubt that under these Sections when it is said that a particular act in order to be punishable be done with such intention, the requisite intention must be proved by the prosecution. It must be proved that the accused aimed or desired that his act…

S.307 IPC NOT ATTRACTED – REDUCED SENTENCE

-April 14, 2023

SECTION 307 IPC WOULD NOT ATTRACT 7. In his statement, the injured appearing as PW-1 submitted that when Munna (PW 6) shouted for help, Kantilal (PW 8) and Radheyshyam (PW 9) came there and seeing them the accused ran away. However, Kantilal (PW 8) was declared hostile. The prosecution had produced another witness Radhey Shyam […]

Conviction Sudden provocation

-April 8, 2023

However, the only question that falls for our consideration is whether the accused are liable to be punished for an offence under Section 302 IPC. After considering the submissions made by the counsel for the Appellants and scrutinising the material on record, we are of the opinion that the accused are not liable to be convicted under Section 302 IPC.…

TRENDING

  • All Post
  • Acquittal
  • Articles
  • Class
  • Cr.P.C 1973
  • Digest
  • Latest
  • Legal Problems Q & A
  • Monthly Digest
  • Notes
  • Quick Recall
  • Recall
  • Resources
  • Thirukkural
  • Uncategorized
    •   Back
    • 138
    • IPC
    • Pocso
    • 482
    •   Back
    • Ad. Karunanithi
    • AD. RAMPRAKASH RAJAGOPAL
    • AD. KARUPPSAMY PANDIYAN
    • P.G.Rajagopal
    • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
    •   Back
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Land grabbing
    •   Back
    • Cr.P.C
    • Evidence Class
    •   Back
    • Crimes
    •   Back
    • POCSO
    • Dying Declaration
    • Murder
    •   Back
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
    •   Back
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • 138
    • IPC
    • Pocso
    • 482
    •   Back
    • weekly digest

Subscribe For More!

Get the latest and creative news updates on criminal law...

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

Disclaimer:

Contents of this Web Site are for general information or use only. They do not constitute any advice and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any personal or public decision. We hereby exclude any warranty, express or implied, as to the quality, accuracy, timeliness, completeness, performance, fitness for a particular page of the Site or any of its contents, including (but not limited) to any financial contents within the Site. We will not be liable for any damages (including, without limitation, damages for loss of business projects, or loss of profits) arising in contract, tort or otherwise from the use of or inability to use the site or any of its contents, or from any action taken (or refrained from being taken) as a result of using the Site or any of its contents. We shall give no warranty that the contents of the Site are free from infection by viruses or anything else which has contaminating or destructive user’s properties though we care to maintain the site virus/malware-free.

For further reading visit our ‘About‘ page.

© 2023 Developed and maintained by PAPERPAGE INTERNET SERVICES

Crypto wallet - Game Changer

Questions explained agreeable preferred strangers too him beautiful her son.