Fraud (if any) is the matter for trial and not to be decided in Quash proceedings

Running an impugned Finance company is not a ground to label the owner as a Notorious Goonda

May 2025: Monthly Digest

False promise to marry cannot be said that the accused indulged in sexual intercourse with the complainant

Nallathangal Syndrome (Suyambukani case) and Master Draftsman ‘Lord McCaulay’

Don’t mention as Lower courts: Acquittal based on the affidavits filed by the eyewitness in Court

THE MARRIAGE OF PARADOX: LOVE, LAW, LIBERTY

Gangsters Act: Mere reiteration of vague allegations from subject FIR made the appellant to stand trial and the same amount to abuse of process of law

Can’t claim false promise to marry if the relationship becomes distant or goes sour

Mere repeating the exact words in a complaint like a mantra would not make the accused responsible for the company’s day-to-day affairs

Since stamp vendors are getting remunerations from the government they are construed as Public Servants

An offence under section 13(1)(e) PC Act can be abetted by any other person who is a non-public servant