The Tamil Nadu Rent Act, 2017 Needs Constitutional Correction

The Chilling Effect: How India’s Criminal Defamation Laws and Legal Roadblocks Hinder People’s Access to Justice, Compared to the U.S. ‘Actual Malice’ Standard That Protects Free Speech in Today’s Digital World

Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) directed the witnesses to pay rs.10 lakh as compensation to the accused in NDPS case for giving false evidence against him

High Court ought not to have granted bail on the sole ground of parity but to have considered all other principles too while granting bail

A confessional FIR given by one accused cannot be used against the other accused including the maker further contents of such FIR cannot be read in evidence

Guidelines to the Courts to take control over investigation including sanctioning order

The offence under Section 195A IPC is a cognizable offence so the power of the police to take action in relation thereto under Sections 154 CrPC and 156 CrPC cannot be doubted

How to examine the witness through video conferencing is explained in this judgment but in a different way

To prove dacoity the offence of robbery must first be established in the case on hand settlement between the parties dilutes the allegation of ‘dishonest intention’ leading to dacoity hence matter quashed

High Courts shall not conduct ‘Mini Trial’ by embarking upon an enquiry about the credibility of the allegations in the complaint and the FIR

Co-accused confession to the police may have relevance only on the recovery made in furtherance of the said disclosure

POCSO is an individual crime further related parties were married and having a child together hence the case is quashed