Must have:

share this post:

PLEA OF ONE OF THE JUDGES TO RECUSE FROM THE MATTER IS DENIED AS FORUM SHOPPING.

summary:

Points for consideration

1. A letter has been circulated by the petitioner praying that one of us may recuse from the matter as while deciding one matter before the High Court in the year 2011 arising out of the same FIR, the Court made stricture against the conduct of the petitioner on the delaying tactics adopted by him.

xxx

5. Having heard the learned Senior Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties at length on the letter circulated, we are of the opinion that the request of recusal is nothing but an attempt to indulge in Forum Shopping and Bench Hunting and to avoid the Bench with mala fide intention. It is to be noted that earlier the Bench headed by one of us heard the special leave petition in a case relating to the very FIR and filed by the very petitioner and at that point of time, no such objection was raised and no such prayer was made. It is also required to be noted that even when the present special leave petition was notified, a number of occasions after the letter dated 09.11.2022, namely, 14.12.2022, 10.01.2023, 27.02.2023, 28.03.2023, 02.05.2023 and the matter was adjourned even at the request of the learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner. At that time, the letter dated 09.11.2022 was not pressed into service. However, thereafter when the present special leave petition is taken up for further hearing today and actually being heard, the letter is pressed into service, which is nothing but an attempt on the part of the petitioner to avoid the Bench, which is required to be deprecated. Earlier, merely because some proceedings might have been heard by one of us before the High Court in connection with the present matter and/or proceedings and some observations might have been made against the petitioner on the delaying tactics, cannot be a ground to accede to the request made by the petitioner. As the prayer lacks bona fide and seems to have been made with mala fide intention to avoid the Bench for no valid reason, the prayer for recusal is rejected.

PARTY: Sanjiv Kumar Rajendrabhai Bhatt vs. State of Gujarat & Anr – SLP (Crl.) No. 9445 of 2022 – MAY 10, 2023.

https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2022/29504/29504_2022_4_12_44404_Judgement_10-May-2023.pdf

Sanjiv Kumar Rajendrabhai Bhatt – forum shopping case

Related Posts

No Posts Found!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe For News

Get the latest sports news from News Site about world, sports and politics.

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

Subscribe For More!

Get the latest and creative news updates on criminal law...

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

Disclaimer:

Contents of this Web Site are for general information or use only. They do not constitute any advice and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any personal or public decision. We hereby exclude any warranty, express or implied, as to the quality, accuracy, timeliness, completeness, performance, fitness for a particular page of the Site or any of its contents, including (but not limited) to any financial contents within the Site. We will not be liable for any damages (including, without limitation, damages for loss of business projects, or loss of profits) arising in contract, tort or otherwise from the use of or inability to use the site or any of its contents, or from any action taken (or refrained from being taken) as a result of using the Site or any of its contents. We shall give no warranty that the contents of the Site are free from infection by viruses or anything else which has contaminating or destructive user’s properties though we care to maintain the site virus/malware-free.

For further reading visit our ‘About‘ page.

© 2023 Developed and maintained by PAPERPAGE INTERNET SERVICES

Crypto wallet - Game Changer

Questions explained agreeable preferred strangers too him beautiful her son.