Must have:

Dying declaration: Witness who recorded the dying declaration must state in his chief-examination that the doctor examined the deceased before giving fitness certificate

Appeal – Prosecution case – Dying declaration to ASI – Evidence of doctor about dying declaration to him firstly – Nothing on record to show why the doctor would lie before the court – Prosecution Witness did not state in his chief-examination that the doctor examined the deceased before giving the fitness certificate – Doctor who gave fitness certificate was not examined by the prosecution – Hon’ble Supreme court doubted entire prosecution witnesses

Dowry death: Absence of any positive viscera report is not fatal to the prosecution

Appeal – Case of the prosecution – Conclusion of trial court and high court – Analysis – Trial court placed reliance on Modi text book – Post-mortem doctor deposes about pungent smell was found in the stomach – Viscera was received by fsl after five months – Detailed research on viscera and its report – Absence of detection of poison in viscera report is not conclusive proof – Preserved materials should be sent to the concerned FSL through the concerned police station as soon as possible.

Guidelines: If surrender of proof not provided then the registry may call for report from the trial judge

Head notes: Apex Court – Application for exemption from surrender is rejected – Communication of surrender of accused should be communicated to the judge – If counsel does not appear in criminal case the court should appoint an amicus – Prisoners are very often unable to communicate to the outside world – Prison authorities are obliged to communicate the surrender of convict to the court – Liberty to the relatives to prefer appeal under section 394 Cr.P.C – Guidelines given if surrender proof is not filed – Jail authorities are required to upload the surrender and custody particulars in web portal

Default bail: Failure to produce the accused for extension of time for investigation and custody is in violation of Article 21

Head note: Extension of custody u/s 167 Cr.P.C: Since accused has the right to oppose the prayer for the extension of the remand, it is necessary to produce the accused physically or through virtual – General principles governing default bail – The effect of the failure of the respondents to produce the appellants before the special Court at the time of consideration of the Extension application – Presence of accused is necessary to extend the custody – Failure to produce the accused for extension of time for investigation and custody is in violation of Article 21.

PONMUDI MINISTER CASE: As per section 13(1)(e)P.C Act 1988, the person holding the properties on behalf of the public servant should also liable to explain the source

Head note: Appreciation of trial court judgment – Trial court conclusion on Accused-2 – Trial court has accepted the version of the defence and not P.W.33 – To disbelieve the state public works department valuation report there must be a better reasonable and intelligible opinion should be examined on the side of defence – Section 45 Indian Evidence Act – Section 24 of the Income Tax Act – Conclusion of High Court on 30% deduction is as to avoid income tax only – High court holds that opinion of P.W.33 regarding the property is reliable – Trial court omitted to add rs. 1,97,000/- which is miscarriage of justice – Trial court without any material accepted the income from agricultural land – Three crores difference in amount during check was claimed as income of A-2 – The falsehood in the self-serving statements of accused was not at all considered or tested by the trial court – V.Suresh Rajan case was rejected by the trial court wherein it was consistently held that income tax returns cannot be held as proof for the legal source of income.

Subscribe For More!

Get the latest and creative news updates on criminal law...

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

Disclaimer:

Contents of this Web Site are for general information or use only. They do not constitute any advice and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any personal or public decision. We hereby exclude any warranty, express or implied, as to the quality, accuracy, timeliness, completeness, performance, fitness for a particular page of the Site or any of its contents, including (but not limited) to any financial contents within the Site. We will not be liable for any damages (including, without limitation, damages for loss of business projects, or loss of profits) arising in contract, tort or otherwise from the use of or inability to use the site or any of its contents, or from any action taken (or refrained from being taken) as a result of using the Site or any of its contents. We shall give no warranty that the contents of the Site are free from infection by viruses or anything else which has contaminating or destructive user’s properties though we care to maintain the site virus/malware-free.

For further reading visit our ‘About‘ page.

© 2023 Developed and maintained by PAPERPAGE INTERNET SERVICES

Crypto wallet - Game Changer

Questions explained agreeable preferred strangers too him beautiful her son.