THE MARRIAGE OF PARADOX: LOVE, LAW, LIBERTY
Gangsters Act: Mere reiteration of vague allegations from subject FIR made the appellant to stand trial and the same amount to abuse of process of law
Can’t claim false promise to marry if the relationship becomes distant or goes sour
Mere repeating the exact words in a complaint like a mantra would not make the accused responsible for the company’s day-to-day affairs
Since stamp vendors are getting remunerations from the government they are construed as Public Servants
An offence under section 13(1)(e) PC Act can be abetted by any other person who is a non-public servant
To register FIR in non-cognizable offence prior permission of Magistrate under section 155 (2) Cr.P.C was necessary
If animus between the accused and complainant is not proved presumption under Section 20 of PCAct would not arise against accused
Evolution of FIR Registration with Comparative analysis of CrPC Sections 154 & 156(3) and BNSS sections 173 & 175(3)
Limitation to initiate contempt proceedings is within one year either by filing an application or by the Court issuing notice Suo motu
Remember me