Cheque cases courts need not summon the accused before taking cognizance since NI Act is a special enactment

Accused were permitted to leave the court without any formal order of release or even without taking a bond under section 88 of the Code

Prosecution has to prove to whom A1 has sold the stolen article and obtained sale proceeds of rs. 8000

Murder case: Acquittal: Not disclosing an important fact to the police assumes great importance and is highly suspicious

Prayer regarding clubbing of present interstate FIRs and also the future FIR is overambitious and outright illegal

In money claim matters appropriate ownership of the sum of money can be determined only after all the evidence is taken and not at the stage of FIR

Quash: NI Act: If the notice amount is different from the cheque amount then cheque proceedings are bad in law and the defence of typographical error is irrelevant

Acquittal: Animosity between the parties is not sufficient to prove the crime either direct or circumstantial

PC Act: Mere registration of disproportionate assets in the name of public servant’s relative or friend does not make that person guilty of abetment [dissenting version in judgment]

Though conviction shall not be based on an extra-judicial confession but in the case on hand the prosecution has proved the murder through other evidence beyond all reasonable doubts

Section 223 BNSS: Whether cognizance on offence or includes offender?

Timely Quash order