Who can prefer the appeal against acquittal in the case initially registered by state police later transferred to CBI investigation is left open to decide in a suitable case

Even on a (private) complaint the Magistrate before taking cognizance is empowered to forward the complaint for investigation under section 156(3) Cr.P.C

Section 149 IPC: It is not necessary that each member of an unlawful assembly to commit overt act but once participation and sharing of a common object is proved every member is liable for the offence

Informer (unidentified informant) not examined before the court nor his statement was reduced hence accused aquitted

TVK & CBI: Karur Stampede: Interim order and directions regarding CBI investigation on the issue

Voice sample of persons: Ritesh Sinha judgment shall apply for Cr.P.C and after 2024 section 349 BNSS shall apply

Permission to cross-examine (hostile) the witness by the party calling should be given only in special cases

Unless there is irregularity in funding from international sources either U.P Act or IPC do not prohibit gatherings or doing charity work in the name of religion

Murder caes: Acquittal: One witness did not mentioned other witnesses at the SOC

Since no provocation nor blow stuck by mistake or accident section 300 Exception- 1 would not attract

No immediate complaint was made and the hymen was intact therefore the conviction and sentence under Section 9(m) read with Section 10 of POCSO cannot be upheld

Criminal court has no power to recall or review its own judgment except to correct or rectify clerical errors by virtue of Section 403 BNSS (section 362 Cr.P.C)