Sign In
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal (Judge Rtd)
      • Ad. Ramprakash Rajagopal
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • Ad. James Raja
      • Ad. M.S.Parthiban
      • Ad. Rajavel
      • Ad. Azhar Basha
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • E-Booklet
    • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Quashing fir: High court cannot conduct mini investigation under section 482 cr.p.c as per Neeharika Infrastructure case
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • E-Booklet
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Quick Recall> General> Quashing fir: High court cannot conduct mini investigation under section 482 cr.p.c as per Neeharika Infrastructure case

Quashing fir: High court cannot conduct mini investigation under section 482 cr.p.c as per Neeharika Infrastructure case

Head note: Prayer - Following Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt Ltd case – Conclusion: Crl.O.P dismissed.
Reshma Azath February 22, 2024 2 Min Read
Share
Quashing fir
Points
PrayerFollowing Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt Ltd caseConclusion: Crl.O.P dismissedParty

Points

Toggle
    • Prayer
    • Following Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt Ltd case
    • Conclusion: Crl.O.P dismissed
    • Party
  • Subject Study
Prayer

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Crime No.75 of 2023 dated 01.04.2023 for the alleged offence under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(b) of I.P.C and pending investigation on the file of the First respondent police and quash the same against the petitioner.

Following Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt Ltd case

3.The contentions put forward by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners are purely factual in nature and this Court cannot venture into conducting a mini investigation into the matter and it therefore does not fall within the ambit of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. This Court must also bear in mind the parameters laid down by the Apex Court in Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd., case reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 315. Any finding on facts will also have a bearing on the investigation conducted by the respondent Police.

4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation conducted by the respondent Police at this stage.

Conclusion: Crl.O.P dismissed

5. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed and the respondent Police is directed to proceed further with the investigation in accordance with law and complete the investigation and file a final report or a closure report, as expeditiously as possible. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Party

R.Vijayakumar …Petitioner Vs. 1.State Rep. by: The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch-I, Vepery, Chennai – 600 008. (Crime No.75 of 2023) 2.Mr.M.Siva Nagarjuna Kumar …Respondents – CRL.O.P No.3879 of 2024 and CRL.M.P No.2856 of 2024 – 21.02.2024.

click here to go to direct link 

R.Vijayakumar-vs-State-rep-by-The-Inspector-of-Police-vepery

Subject Study

  • Writing judgment is an art
  • If the accused is admonished by the court then the court cannot impose compensation too
  • A timeless guidance of Hon’ble Madras High Court for young generation to stay away from pornography
  • Section 156(3) Cr.P.C: Magistrates can direct Preliminary inquiry under section 156 (3) crpc and ask for action taken report from the station house officer (SHO)
  • Trial court shall not insist the defence counsel to put particular question in particular manner
  • Cr.P.C., 1973. Notes no.7: Information to the police and their powers to investigate (Chapter XII – Part.1)
  • N.I ACT: Initiation of criminal proceeding under sections 138 &141 N.I Act is covered under moratorium provision [U/S 14 IBC]
  • Quash: Apex Court quashed the G.O of TamilNadu constituting special courts for Land Grabbing cases and advice to enact appropriate legislation

Further Study

Quash: Delay in lodging fir without date and time affects the case

Multiple firs against single accused is directed to be tried by one court

Defamation Quash: No averments in the complaint to establish as to how appellant-2 was responsible for controlling the contents of the newspaper publication

Quash: From the statement of victim boy itself reveals that he was reprimanded by the petitioner for watching and commenting girls karate training

INFORMATIONS ON FIRST INFORMATION REPORT

TAGGED:firneeharika casequash
Previous Article quash set-aside Quash set-aside: Prosecution may be lodged by or with the permission of the Sub-Registrar as per section 83 of the Registration Act, 1908
Next Article Acquittal: If there are convincing eyewitnesses then non-examination of expert does not affect the prosecution case
2 Comments
  • Pingback: Monthly Case laws Digest for February’ 2024 - section1.in
  • John says:
    April 17, 2024 at 1:53 pm

    I’m really inspired together with your writing abilities as neatly as with the format
    Best online deals for aldactone your blog.
    Is this a paid topic or did you customize it yourself?
    Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it is uncommon to peer a nice weblog like this one nowadays..

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

suspension

Suspension of sentence should be considered by the appellate court liberally in fixed-term sentence unless there are exceptional circumstances

Ramprakash Rajagopal August 14, 2025
Fraud (if any) is the matter for trial and not to be decided in Quash proceedings
Acquittal: Animosity between the parties is not sufficient to prove the crime either direct or circumstantial
False promise to marry cannot be said that the accused indulged in sexual intercourse with the complainant
How to calculate limitation in criminal cases: Explained?

Related Study

No printed or mechanical order for section 156(3) Cr.P.C
March 6, 2023
Sudalaimani vs state – 2014-2-LW(Crl.) 372
January 5, 2025
Section 154 Cr.P.C: Police has no other option except to register fir if cognizable offence found and magistrate must direct investigation if cognizable offence found in the complaint
February 22, 2025
Procedure in Rape and Offences against women  Cases Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 ; A Victim Centric Approach
September 2, 2025
Section 106 Evidence Act: Yardstick in convicting accused in circumstantial evidence invoking s.106 Evidence Act
June 27, 2023

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?