Sign In
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal (Judge Rtd)
      • Ad. Ramprakash Rajagopal
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • Ad. James Raja
      • Ad. M.S.Parthiban
      • Ad. Rajavel
      • Ad. Azhar Basha
      • Mr. Lokkeshvaran
      • Prasath
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
    • Legal Drafting
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • E-Booklet
    • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Affidavit – Magistrate cannot take proof affidavit except N.I Act
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • E-Booklet
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Legal Problems Q & A> Affidavit – Magistrate cannot take proof affidavit except N.I Act

Affidavit – Magistrate cannot take proof affidavit except N.I Act

Affidavit - Magistrate cannot take proof affidavit except N.I Act
Ramprakash Rajagopal March 28, 2023 1 Min Read
Share

4. At the outset, this Court is of the view that merely on proof affidavit, cognizance cannot be taken. As per Section 200 of Cr.P.C., whenever any cognizance to be taken in a criminal case, other than the cases like under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the complainant should be examined on oath. Without following the above procedure, the petitioner cannot insist the Magistrate to take cognizance by filing proof affidavit.

Party

A.Senthilkumar vs. Thiru.Nandhakumar – CRL.O.P.No. 9148 of 2022 – 26.07.2022.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/673612
Download

 

Further Study

No affidavit no Suspension of sentence?

N.I Act: Certain documents were suppressed in the statement on oath and made out a false case

Magistrate ordinarily would not entertain application u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C without first approached the police authorities but he can direct investigation u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C if the complaint discloses cognizable offence

Affidavit: Court cannot convert complaint into a 156(3) cr.p.c petition without following procedures

Cr.P.C., 1973. Notes no.9: Second FIR, General propositions as to FIR, appreciation & Evidentiary value of first information report (Chapter XII – Part.3, 4, 5 & 6)

TAGGED:200affidavitcomplaint and affidavitcrpcmagistrate and affidavitno affidavitsection 200
Previous Article Whether the sessions court can take second cognizance u/s 193Cr.P.C after the case was committed by the Magistrate who took cognizance u/s 190 Cr.P.C earlier?
Next Article Section142 N.I Act does not override section 406 Cr.P.C but Supreme Court has powers to transfer cases
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

section 451

In money claim matters appropriate ownership of the sum of money can be determined only after all the evidence is taken and not at the stage of FIR

Ramprakash Rajagopal September 20, 2025
Cheque cases courts need not summon the accused before taking cognizance since NI Act is a special enactment
To prove dacoity the offence of robbery must first be established in the case on hand settlement between the parties dilutes the allegation of ‘dishonest intention’ leading to dacoity hence matter quashed
Litigants come to court expecting the justice delivery system to function in accordance with law and not to obtain absurd or irrational orders
No immediate complaint was made and the hymen was intact therefore the conviction and sentence under Section 9(m) read with Section 10 of POCSO cannot be upheld

Related Study

Section 311 Cr.P.C: Recall may be allowed if no occasion to bring relevant facts at initial deposition
December 29, 2023
Section 193 IPC: Affidavit: Since no malafide intention is in the statement mere suspicion or inaccurate statement in the affidavit does not attract the offence of perjury
August 28, 2024
Murder case acquittal: Alcohol presence is in the body and chance of fell from a grown high tree
December 13, 2023
Role of De-facto complainant during investigation and further investigation
October 13, 2024
S. 303(2) BNS: Anticipatory Bail was filed for a bailable offence however the  Hon’ble High Court quashed the FIR
May 14, 2025
Delay: Impact of delay in recording statement of witnesses
January 26, 2023
N.I Act: Knowledge of Power of Attorney of an individual payee must be specifically stated and in the case of company being a payee the authorised person who has knowledge would be sufficient
June 5, 2025
Voluntarily causing Grievous hurt: Bald statement against the accused that ‘they beat me up’ without supporting material does not cover section 323 ipc
January 3, 2024
Powers of constitutional courts to transfer, or order further investigation: explained
February 25, 2023
Sale is not a Contract
November 7, 2024

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks
  • Founder

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             A product of © Paperpage Internet Services. All Rights Reserved. 

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?