Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
    • Supreme Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
  • Quick Recall
    • Arms Act
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • Evidence
    • Drugs Act
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
    • Pocso
    • MCOP
    • Writ
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • 3 judge bench
  • Resources
    • Notes
      • Cr.P.C 1973
      • Crimes
    • Articles
      • P.G.Rajagopal
      • AD. RAMPRAKASH RAJAGOPAL
      • Ad. Karunanithi
      • Ad. Ravindran Raghunathan
      • James Raja
    • Digest
      • Monthly Digest
      • Weekly digest
      • Subject wise
    • Bare Acts
      • BSA 2023
      • BNS 2023
      • BNSS 2023
  • Must Read
  • Author’s note
  • Legal words
  • Civil
    • s. 91 cpc
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Once a foreigner is released on bail he cannot leave India without the permission of the Civil Authority and the Court should direct the investigating agency or the State to inform the concerned Registration Officer
Share
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest
  • Acquittal
  • Digest
  • Resources
Search
  • Latest
    • Madras High Court
    • Madurai Bench
    • Supreme Court
  • Quick Recall
    • Evidence
    • Cr.P.C
    • IPC
    • N.I.Act
    • Pocso
    • PMLA
    • NDPS
    • Corruption Laws
    • General
    • Passports Act
  • Acquittal
    • S.C
    • Madras High Court
  • Digest
    • Monthly Digest
    • Weekly digest
  • Resources
    • Notes
    • Articles
  • 3 judge bench
  • Must have
  • Author’S Note
  • Legal words
  • About
    • Terms
    • Privacy policy
    • Cancellation & Refund Policy
    • Team
  • Mobile APP
  • My Bookmarks

Get Notifications

Notification
Follow US
> Quick Recall> General> Once a foreigner is released on bail he cannot leave India without the permission of the Civil Authority and the Court should direct the investigating agency or the State to inform the concerned Registration Officer

Once a foreigner is released on bail he cannot leave India without the permission of the Civil Authority and the Court should direct the investigating agency or the State to inform the concerned Registration Officer

The Hon’ble Supreme Court addresses the procedural particulars/details concerning bail applications filed by foreigners under the Foreigners Act, 1946, and the Registration of Foreigners Rules, 1992. The Apex court questioned whether it is necessary to implead a Foreign Registration Officer in bail applications filed by foreigners. Apex court clarifies that while the Central Government has the authority to regulate the entry, presence, and departure of foreigners under Section 3 of the Act, the Civil Authority's role in granting permission to depart from India is crucial, especially when a foreigner is required to answer a criminal charge. The court emphasized that the Civil Authority must refuse permission for a foreigner to leave India if their presence is needed for criminal proceedings. However, the Hon’ble Supreme court found no propriety in mandating the inclusion of the Civil Authority or Registration Officer as parties in bail applications, as this could lead to unnecessary delays. As an alternative, the Hon’ble Supreme court directed that upon granting bail to a foreigner, the investigating agency or state must immediately inform the concerned Registration Officer, who will then notify all relevant authorities. It is emphasized that these authorities possess no standing to contest bail unless the charges are under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act. This ensures that appropriate steps can be taken in accordance with the law, balancing the need for procedural efficiency with the enforcement of legal provisions governing foreigners.
Ramprakash Rajagopal January 7, 2025 9 Min Read
Share
foreigner bail
Points
AppealQuestion of lawCentral Government has power to regulate entry or departure of foreigners“5. Power to grant permission to depart from India.Party

Appeal

Question of law

1. By judgment and order dated 08th July, 2024, two main issues concerning bail conditions were decided. Now, the issue that remains to be answered is whether it is necessary to implead a Foreign Registration Officer appointed under Rule 3 of the Registration of Foreigners Rules, 1992 (for short ‘the Rules’) in the bail application filed by a foreigner within the meaning of the Foreigners Act, 1946 (for short ‘the Act’). Under Section 2(a) of the Act, a foreigner means a person who is not a citizen of India.

Central Government has power to regulate entry or departure of foreigners

2. Under Section 3 of the Act, there is a power vested in the Central Government to issue an order making provisions either generally or concerning any particular foreigner or class of foreigners of prohibiting, regulating or restricting the entry of foreigners into India or their departure therefrom or their presence or continued presence. Under clause (g) of Section 3(2), a power has been conferred on the Central Government to issue an order directing that a foreigner shall be arrested or detained or confined.

3. In the exercise of the power conferred under Section 3 of the Act, the Foreigners Order, 1948 (for short, ‘the Order’) has been issued. Clause 2(2) of the Order provides for appointing a Civil Authority by the Central Government. Clause 5 of the Order deals with the power to grant permission to depart from India. Clause 5 of the Order reads thus:

“5. Power to grant permission to depart from India.

(1) No foreigner shall leave India:-

(a) otherwise than at such port or other recognised place of departure on the borders of India as a Registration Officer having jurisdiction at that port or place may appoint in this behalf, either for foreigners generally or for any specified class or description of foreigners; or

(b) without the leave of the civil authority having jurisdiction at such port or place.

(2) Leave shall be refused if the civil authority is satisfied that

(a) the foreigner has failed to comply with the formalities of departure prescribed under the Registration of Foreigners Rules, 1939;

(b) the foreigners presence is required in India to answer a criminal charge;

(c) the foreigners departure will prejudice the relations of the Central Government with a foreign power;

(d) the departure of the foreigner has been prohibited under an order issued by a competent authority.

(3) (a) Notwithstanding anything contained in the above sub-paragraphs, a civil authority may prohibit the departure of a foreigner where it is satisfied that such departure would not be conducive to the public interest.

(b) Whenever a civil authority issues an order under clause (a), it shall report the matter forthwith to the Central Government which may cancel or modify the order in such manner as it thinks fit.” (emphasis added)

Under sub-clause (2) of clause 5, leave must be refused by the Civil Authority if it is satisfied that the foreigner’s presence is required in India to answer a criminal charge.

5. Under clause (b) of Section 3(2) of the Act, there is a power vested in the Central Government to issue an order generally or with respect to any particular foreigner or class of foreigners that they shall not depart from India or shall depart subject to observance of such conditions on departure as may be prescribed. The Rules do not impose any such restriction on departure from India. However, as noted earlier, according to clause 5(1)(b) of the Order, no foreigner shall leave India without the leave of the Civil Authority having jurisdiction. When a foreigner’s presence is required in India to answer a criminal charge, permission to leave India must be refused. Under the Order, the Civil Authority can impose restrictions on the movements of a foreigner. Therefore, once a foreigner is released on bail, he cannot leave India without the permission of the Civil Authority, as provided in clause 5 of the Order. Under clause 11 and other clauses of the Order, various restrictions can be imposed on a foreigner while he is in India. The said power is wholly independent of the power to grant bail. As of today, there is no order passed by the Central Government for giving effect to clause (g) of Section 3(2) of the Act. In any event, even if such an order is issued, the power to arrest or detain a foreigner under the Act is independent of the power of the criminal court to grant bail. Notwithstanding the bail granted by a criminal court, the power to arrest and detain a foreigner can be exercised, provided the Central Government makes an order in terms of clause (g) of Section 3(2) of the Act.

6. Therefore, we do not see any propriety in issuing a direction that either the Civil Authority or the Registration Officer should be made a party to a bail application filed by a foreigner or a notice of the bail application be issued to the said authorities. The reason is that the authorities under the Act and the Order have no locus to oppose bail application filed by a foreigner unless bail is sought where the allegation is of the offence punishable under Section 14 of the Act. The impleadment of the Civil Authority or Registration Officer in all bail applications filed by foreigners may result in unnecessary delay in deciding the bail applications.

7. All that can be done is that while releasing a foreigner on bail, the Court should direct the investigating agency or the State, as the case may be, to immediately inform the concerned Registration Officer appointed under Rule 3 of the Rules about the grant of bail so that the Registration Officer can bring the fact of the grant of bail to the notice of concerned Civil Authority.

8. In addition to what we held by judgment and order dated 08th July, 2024, we issue the following directions:

(i) While granting bail to a foreigner within the meaning of the Act, the concerned court shall issue direction to the State or prosecuting agency, as the case may be, to immediately communicate the order granting bail to the concerned Registration Officer appointed under Rule 3 of the Rules who, in turn, shall communicate the order to all concerned authorities including the Civil Authorities. If such information is furnished, it will enable the authorities under the Act, the Rules and the Order to take appropriate steps in accordance with the law; and

(ii) A copy of this order shall be forwarded to Registrar Generals of all the High Courts, who in turn will forward the copies of the order to all the criminal courts in the respective States.

9. The Criminal Appeals shall be treated as disposed of in terms of the judgment and order dated 08th July, 2024 and this order.

Party

Frank Vitus …Appellant versus Narcotics Control Bureau and Ors. …Respondents – Criminal Appeal Nos. 2814-2815 of 2024 – 2025 INSC 30 – JANUARY 06, 2025

Frank Vitus vs. NCB – 66872023_2025-01-06Download

Subject Study

  • Principles governing for granting bail
  • Bail: Reasoning order is necessary: If cryptic order informant has right to assail before a higher forum

Further Study

Judgments full of citations on all the principles of criminal law

Section 167 crpc: Accused cannot claim default bail on the ground that the further investigation against other accused is pending

Dowry Death: Since witnesses stating the dowry demand only before the court (significant omission) would not establish section 304B IPC

Officers investigating the SC/ST offence are duty bound to be vigilant before invoking any provision of a very stringent statute

Section 195(1)(b)(ii) would be attracted only when the document was in the custodia legis (custody of the law) and not otherwise

TAGGED:bail to foreignerdirectionforeignerforeigner bailmust haveregistryrelease of foreignerrule 3
SOURCES:https://www.sci.gov.in/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=get_court_pdf&diary_no=66872023&type=j&order_date=2025-01-06&from=latest_judgements_order
Previous Article cbi investigation CBI had the authority to investigate offences involving Central Government employees under a Central Act without needing state consent
Next Article ndps return of property Return of property in NDPS Act: Hon’ble Supreme court after explain four scenarios held that in the absence of specific bar under the NDPS court can invoke general power under sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Study

adverse possession

Can a state claim adverse possession over the property of private citizens? – SC Answers

M.S.Parthiban December 13, 2024
When doctrine of lis pendens commences?
Plea of alibi gone wrong for murder case also defence on lack of sanction won’t work 
Dowry death: Complainant displayed honesty by making allegations only against the appellant and not implicating other family members unnecessarily
How to mark confession explained: If inadmissible portions of confession are allowed in deposition, there is a significant risk that the trial courts may be influenced by it

Related Study

Appellants went to deceased’s house armed demonstrating premeditation and intention to cause injury and thus not qualifying for any exceptions under section 300 IPC
April 3, 2025
Murder: What is ‘cruel’ under exception 4 of section 300 IPC?
December 3, 2024
Non-explanation of injuries inflicted on the accused is serious to the prosecution case
November 8, 2023
Defence counsels don’t worry I teach you to take defence
January 8, 2023
Forgery case: Quashed: If in certain cases where the wrong is being settled between the parties amicably then High Court would be justified in quashing even offences that are not compoundable
October 11, 2024

About

Section1.in is all about the legal updates in Criminal and Corporate Laws. This website also gives opportunity to publish your (readers/users) articles subject to the condition of being edited (only if necessary) by the team of Advocates. Kindly send your articles to paperpageindia@gmail.com or WhatsApp to +919361570190.
  • Quick Links
  • Team
  • Terms
  • Cancellation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • My Bookmarks

section1.in is powered by Paperpage.             © Paperpage Internet Services.                       All Rights Reserved.

Subscribe Newsletter for free

Subscribe to our newsletter to get judgments instantly!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ஓர்ந்துகண் ணோடாது இறைபுரிந்து யார்மாட்டும் தேர்ந்துசெய் வஃதே முறை [541].

_திருவள்ளுவர்
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?