- As per section 21 POCSO Act only those who received credible information directly could be prosecuted for failure to report and not all the teachers or office bearers of the institution also no suppression of information is reportedby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Anticipatory Bail is not needed in complaint cases if apprehension of arrest is only by the policeby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Honour killing: The court must see whether a hostile witness is totally discredited if not the court should not discard his testimony entirelyby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Sentencing: Though the furnishing of a forged revenue document for surety in judicial proceedings is serious in nature but is not organised crime and has not caused any widespread financial lossby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- S.304 II IPC: Injuries were caused by an abrupt fall into the dry canal and not by stones thrown by the accused at the deceasedby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- RCS notice and Rule 26 of The Tamilnadu Criminal Rules of Practice., 2019by Raja vel
- Acquittal: Who Pulled the Trigger? Prosecution version remains acceptable till the point of bullet entering the skull but suspicious when it travels upward while exiting the skullby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Incomplete Form ‘F’ Attracts Substantive Penalties and Strict Adherence to Record-Keeping is Mandatory Under PCPNDT Act (Prenatal Diagnostics Act)by Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Important Citations (Criminal Branch): Vol.1 – For Effective Administration of Justiceby Reshma Azath
- Filicide: Absence of poison in the viscera may be due to metabolized or eliminated from the body before deathby Reshma Azath
- Joint appeal: ‘an appeal’ followed by ‘the appeal’ are same within the meaning of the sections 392, 374 and 378 Cr.P.C as if ‘any proceeding” followed by ‘the proceeding’ in Section 397 Cr.P.C thereof [Referred to Larger Bench]by Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Section 223(1) BNSS: Though the complaint was filed earlier cognizance was taken after BNSS came into force and appellant not heard before cognizance is an illegality would vitiate the proceedingsby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- NDPS: Confiscation: Sections 36-C and 51 NDPS do not deny the use of sections 451 (s.497 BNSS) and 457 (503 BNSS) and section 60 does not deny interim custody to bona fide ownerby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Suspension of Sentence: Appeal seems to be remote and having regard to the huge pendency of criminal appeals in the High Court bail orderedby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Despite investigation records being untraceable and yet the investigation kept pending for two decades is nothing but delayed and denied justiceby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Guidelines to remedy the persistent delay in the pronouncement of reserved judgments by High Courtsby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Quash: When the amount was fully settled by way of compromise before DRT lodging a complaint before CBI for fraud and forgery is an abuse of process of lawby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Bail order set aside: Twin conditions laid down under section 37 NDPS Act should be considered in commercial quantity casesby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Now You Can File Quash Application In Domestic Violence Cases: Hon’ble Supreme Court Settled The Issueby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Rs.11 Lakh compensation: The respondent-state challenging the permanent parole granted by the single High Court while having appellant in its illegal custody is against the ‘obey first appeal later’ rule and Article 21by Ramprakash Rajagopal
Further Study
No Related Posts Found.
