- Rape case: Santosh Gurung vs State of Sikkim: S.C Quashes Life Sentence Based on Broken Circumstantial Evidenceby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Practice & Procedures: Section 138 NI Act Trial Court Proceduresby section1
- 30 Landmark Supreme Court of India Criminal Law Judgments Explainedby section1
- Statement of the victim (deceased) to her mother and the mother repeats the same in her testimony (deposition) is admissible in evidence as dying declarationby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Practice & Procedure: Section 175(3) BNSS (formerly Section 156(3) CrPC)by section1
- Acquittal: Kartika v. State of Odisha: SC on Pitch-Dark Identification and Circumstantial Evidenceby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Quashing Petition under Sec 528 BNSS / 482 CrPC: Guide & Format (Including landmark judgment)by section1
- Sessions Court Cannot Bar Remission under Section 302 IPC: SCby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Abu Salem Case: Supreme Court Rejects Premature Release Plea | 2026 INSC 982by Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Baptismal Certificate Inadmissible under sec.35 IEA and Cannot Prove the Age of Minor: Conviction Modified POCSO Conviction to Rapeby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Requirement of Mens Rea (“Sexual Intent”) & Non-Criminalisation of Classroom Disciplineby Reshma Azath
- Supreme Court on Corporate Criminal Liability: The New Three-Stage Test for Attributing Mens Rea to a Companyby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Judicial Transfers in MP MLA Courts: Why the Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay Safeguards Matter?by section1
- Digest: Supreme Court & Madras HC Judgments (Jul-Sep 2026)by Reshma Azath
- Supreme Court Acquits in POCSO Case: TIP Cannot Replace Dock Identificationby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Inordinate Delay in Serving Summons Cannot Quash Criminal Proceedings After Charges are Framed: Madras HCby Sathiyajyothi Sabapathi
- Sivakumar vs State: Mere Use of the Word ‘Bastard’ is Not an Offence Under Section 294(b) IPCby Sathiyajyothi Sabapathi
- Acquittal: Gunshot: Witnesses might have already planned to frame the accused since they know the accused owned licensed weaponby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Supreme Court Rejects ‘Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus’ and accused also well known to the witnessesby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Madras High Court Rules: Attacking Vital Body Parts is Attempted Murder, Even if Injuries are Minorby Reshma Azath
Further Study
No Related Posts Found.
