- Rs.11 Lakh compensation: The respondent-state challenging the permanent parole granted by the single High Court while having appellant in its illegal custody is against the ‘obey first appeal later’ rule and Article 21by Ramprakash Rajagopal
- An Incomplete Legislative Response to Mob Violence; Restricting Criminalization to Cases Resulting in Death and Negating the Requirement of Mens Reaby section1
- Approver: Since direct evidence has come through the approver (PW.1) who is creditworthy and the circumstantial evidence also corroborated him led to convictionby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Moratorium Protections (IBC) in Section 138 Proceedings referred to Larger Benchby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Section 304A IPC: Acquittal: Driver acted by following conductor’s instructions and moved the bus cannot be said to be recklessby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Murder Case: Acquittal: Prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the recovery of dead body and failure to do Test Identification Parade of articlesby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- No Cheating: It is not alleged that signatures appearing on the Power of Attorney were forged or fabricated and that the executants were impersonated hence disputed claim over the property title is not creating false documentby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- After appointing the amicus Curiae he must given a reasonable time to prepare and to meet the accused to get instructionsby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Identity of the accused disclosed by the witnesses (PW.8 & 9) after the arrest of the accused through belated and improved testimonies damaging prosecution’s caseby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Section 106 IEA: Appellant did not provide satisfactory explanation either for injury marks found on the deceased wife though this fact was within the special knowledge of the accusedby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- A cryptic order rejecting the prolonged incarceration (22 years) for premature release is quashed [Supreme Court quoted Plato’s advice]by Ramprakash Rajagopal
- What’s New In April’26by section1
- A Study On Secondary Evidence (notes)by section1
- Acquittal: POCSO: Not conducting a potency test on the accused along with the negative DNA report and lack of eyewitness to the incident creates suspicion about the prosecution’s caseby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Section 34 IPC: Evidence on record falls short of establishing either a prior meeting of minds hence mere presence is insufficient to convict the accused with the aid of Section 34 IPCby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Death Penalty: Supreme Court direct the High Court and States to render skilled and adequate resourced legal representationby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Appellant made total denial in his s.313 Cr.P.C statement which is contrary to he fact that he has been admitted in care hospital and no explanation to this denial lead to possession of poisionby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- No Second Section 156(3) CrPC Petition After Closure of Preliminary Inquiry remedy lies only under section 200 CrPCby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Faulty investigation: Though the police officer reached the spot immediately based on the telephone information but did not follow the investigation procedures resulting in prosecution of 16 personsby Ramprakash Rajagopal
- Though there are variations in the two dying declarations the second dying declaration is found more believable and witnesses did not state many facts in their 161 statementsby Ramprakash Rajagopal
Further Study
No Related Posts Found.
