General

The facts of the present case can be brought under exception I of Section 300 of IPC and thus is punishable u/s. 304(I) of IPC and not u/s. 302 of IPC

MURUGESH VS STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

nbw
General

Recall: 70(2) CrPC: Only Revision lies against order issuing against NBW and not Crl.O.P jurisdiction [Editor’s note inside]

Latest

POCSO: Victim’s testimony before the Court is clear and cogent and almost the same as per the statement recorded u/s. 164 Cr.P.C and there has been no exaggeration or any inconsistency

demand
Acquittal

Discrepancy in the use of the complainant’s fingers (two or five) to pick up the demanded money from his pocket has some bearing while considering the entire evidence

156
BNSS

Rejecting the petition filed under section 156(3) CrPC does not prevent the police to register FIR inasmuch the poser of registering FIR flows from section 154 CrPC

- Advertisement -
Ad image
quash
Acquittal

Quash: The security clause in the agreement discusses adjustment and not refunds thus no criminal offence made out

assault
BNS

Recovery of weapons of assault is not the sine qua non for convicting the accused since the four eye-witnesses versions corroborated

section 202 crpc
BNSS

If the accused resides outside the jurisdiction there need not be a separate inquiry or investigation under section 202 CrPC for complaints filed by public servants

appeal
General

Whether complainant should obtain special leave in the case of appeal against acquittal referred to larger bench

bail cancellation
Uncategorized

Once the High Court noted multiple injuries on the deceased’s body there was no reason to grant bail to the accused

abscond
BNS

In exceptional circumstances the court may grant anticipatory bail to an absconder but a co-accused’s acquittal does not ipso facto entitle him to A.B relief

secondary evidence
BSA

Literature on Secondary Evidence: Judgment explaining statutory procedure to introduce, mark and appreciate secondary evidence

bail and forged law degree
BNS

Bail cancelled due to accused suppressing his criminal antecedents and the submission of a forged Law degree

bribe scam
General

Madras High court directed Vigilance to inquire about a Senior counsel receiving rs. 50 Lakh as Fees to give Judge to get order

rape quash
Acquittal

Quash: Madras High Court recognises modern day relationship in legal aspects and rules that law is not an instrument for resolving emotional disputes

acquittal
Acquittal

EC ACT: On the date of prosecution both the laws regarding cement were not in operation hence unauthorised storage of cement by the accused is not illegal

SCST Act
Acquittal

Accused must first commit an offence under the IPC in addition accused must know that the victim belongs to SC or ST

Show More